Hot Rocks Survey I: A possible shallow eclipse for LHS 1478 b

Context. M-dwarf systems offer an opportunity to study terrestrial exoplanetary atmospheres due to their small size and cool temperatures. However, the extreme conditions imposed by these host stars raise a question about whether their close-in rocky planets are able to retain any atmosphere at all. Aims. The Hot Rocks Survey aims to answer this question by targeting nine different M-dwarf rocky planets spanning a range of planetary and stellar properties. Of these, LHS 1478 b orbits an M3-type star, has an equilibrium temperature of T eq = 585 K, and receives 21 times Earth’s instellation. Methods. We observed two secondary eclipses of LHS 1478 b using photometric imaging at 15 µm using the Mid-Infrared Instrument on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST MIRI) to measure thermal emission from the dayside of the planet. We compared these values to atmospheric models to evaluate potential heat transport and CO 2 absorption signatures. Results. We find that a secondary eclipse depth of 138 ± 53 ppm at the expected time for a circular orbit is preferred over a null model at 2.8σ, a moderate detection, though dynamical models do favour a non-eccentric orbit for this planet. The second observation results in a non-detection due to significantly larger unexplained systematics. Based on the first observation alone, we can reject the null hypothesis of the dark (zero Bond albedo) no atmosphere bare rock model with a confidence level of 3.3σ, though for A B = 0.2 the significance decreases to 2.1σ. The tentative secondary eclipse depth is consistent with the majority of the atmospheric scenarios we considered, spanning CO 2 -rich atmospheres with surface pressures from 0.1 to 10 bar. However, we stress that the two observations from our programme do not yield consistent results, and more observations are needed to verify our findings. The Hot Rocks Survey serves as a relevant primer for future endeavours such as the Director’s Discretionary Time (DDT) Rocky Worlds programme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452611
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hot Rocks Survey I: A possible shallow eclipse for LHS 1478 b

João M. Mendonça, N. Espinoza, Alexander D. Rathcke, Amélie Gressier et al.
24 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
32.04
article

Hot Rocks Survey I: A possible shallow eclipse for LHS 1478 b

João M. Mendonça, N. Espinoza, Alexander D. Rathcke, Amélie Gressier, Neale P. Gibson, Chloe Fisher, R. Barnes, M. J. Hooton, B. Prinoth, N. H. Allen, L. A. Buchhave, K. Jones, K. Heng, D. Kitzmann, Hannah Diamond-Lowe, J. D. Eastman, Prune C. August, Brice-Olivier Demory, E. A. Meier Valdés, J. Hoeijmakers, M. Fortune
article en
24 citations

Abstract

Context. M-dwarf systems offer an opportunity to study terrestrial exoplanetary atmospheres due to their small size and cool temperatures. However, the extreme conditions imposed by these host stars raise a question about whether their close-in rocky planets are able to retain any atmosphere at all. Aims. The Hot Rocks Survey aims to answer this question by targeting nine different M-dwarf rocky planets spanning a range of planetary and stellar properties. Of these, LHS 1478 b orbits an M3-type star, has an equilibrium temperature of T eq = 585 K, and receives 21 times Earth’s instellation. Methods. We observed two secondary eclipses of LHS 1478 b using photometric imaging at 15 µm using the Mid-Infrared Instrument on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST MIRI) to measure thermal emission from the dayside of the planet. We compared these values to atmospheric models to evaluate potential heat transport and CO 2 absorption signatures. Results. We find that a secondary eclipse depth of 138 ± 53 ppm at the expected time for a circular orbit is preferred over a null model at 2.8σ, a moderate detection, though dynamical models do favour a non-eccentric orbit for this planet. The second observation results in a non-detection due to significantly larger unexplained systematics. Based on the first observation alone, we can reject the null hypothesis of the dark (zero Bond albedo) no atmosphere bare rock model with a confidence level of 3.3σ, though for A B = 0.2 the significance decreases to 2.1σ. The tentative secondary eclipse depth is consistent with the majority of the atmospheric scenarios we considered, spanning CO 2 -rich atmospheres with surface pressures from 0.1 to 10 bar. However, we stress that the two observations from our programme do not yield consistent results, and more observations are needed to verify our findings. The Hot Rocks Survey serves as a relevant primer for future endeavours such as the Director’s Discretionary Time (DDT) Rocky Worlds programme.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 695
University of Bern (CH), Space Telescope Science Institute (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Lund University (SE), University of Washington (US), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Warwick (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Cavendish Hospital (GB), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US), University of Southampton (GB), University College London (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), International Space Science Institute (CH), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Space Telescope Science Institute, European Commission, Science Foundation Ireland, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Carlsbergfondet, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, European Research Council, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
32.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.