Extreme Value Theory in High Dimensional Statistical Models and its Application in Anomaly Detection

When comparing anomaly detection methods in high-dimensional data environments, PCA and One Class SVM are often associated with high computational complexity and low computational efficiency. This article selects the CIFAR-10 dataset as the experimental object, and uses extreme value theory, principal component analysis, and One Class SVM methods for anomaly detection. Then, the detection research results of 20 classes are analyzed and compared. In order to objectively evaluate and compare the efficiency of these three anomaly detection methods, the recognition time (in milliseconds) was tested. Experimental studies have shown that anomaly detection based on extreme value theory outperforms PCA and One Class SVM methods in recognition time. The reason why this technology has better recognition time is because the extreme value theory anomaly detection method relies on the distribution characteristics of high-dimensional data, which has a relatively simple and effective calculation process, while PCA and One Class SVM anomaly detection methods use complex model training and feature transformation, which increases the calculation time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmnwc63764.2024.10872329
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extreme Value Theory in High Dimensional Statistical Models and its Application in Anomaly Detection

Meihong Deng
2 citations
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
1.08
article

Extreme Value Theory in High Dimensional Statistical Models and its Application in Anomaly Detection

Meihong Deng
article en
2 citations

Abstract

When comparing anomaly detection methods in high-dimensional data environments, PCA and One Class SVM are often associated with high computational complexity and low computational efficiency. This article selects the CIFAR-10 dataset as the experimental object, and uses extreme value theory, principal component analysis, and One Class SVM methods for anomaly detection. Then, the detection research results of 20 classes are analyzed and compared. In order to objectively evaluate and compare the efficiency of these three anomaly detection methods, the recognition time (in milliseconds) was tested. Experimental studies have shown that anomaly detection based on extreme value theory outperforms PCA and One Class SVM methods in recognition time. The reason why this technology has better recognition time is because the extreme value theory anomaly detection method relies on the distribution characteristics of high-dimensional data, which has a relatively simple and effective calculation process, while PCA and One Class SVM anomaly detection methods use complex model training and feature transformation, which increases the calculation time.

Wuhan Institute of Bioengineering (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.