Axion minima in string theory

A bstract We study the landscape of axion theories in compactifications of type IIB string theory on orientifolds of Calabi-Yau threefolds. In a sample of approximately 400,000 geometries we find that in the regime of perturbative control there are only a handful of distinct axion minima per geometry, despite there being infinitely many instanton contributions to the potential with unbounded charges. The ensemble we consider has numbers of axion fields ranging from 1 to 491, but the median number of distinct minima is 1, the mean number is 1.9 and the largest is 54. These small numbers of minima occur because the leading axion charge matrix is quite sparse, while the subleading corrections are increasingly exponentially suppressed as the charges increase. On their own, such potentials are nowhere near rich enough to be of interest anthropically. This is in stark contrast to potentials for which the charge matrix is less sparse or the hierarchies between the instanton contributions are less steep, where one can find $$ \mathcal{O}\left({10}^{500}\right) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>500</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> minima for $$ \mathcal{O}(500) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>500</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> axions. To generate a sufficiently large landscape from string compactifications our results indicate that one would need to rely on varying flux or topology, or to develop tools that allow one to go beyond the regime we can control with current techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2025)134
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Axion minima in string theory

Joan La Madrid, Viraf M. Mehta, Matthew Kleban, Oliver Janssen et al.
4 citations
Journal of High Energy Physics
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
4.62
article

Axion minima in string theory

Joan La Madrid, Viraf M. Mehta, Matthew Kleban, Oliver Janssen, Naomi Gendler
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A bstract We study the landscape of axion theories in compactifications of type IIB string theory on orientifolds of Calabi-Yau threefolds. In a sample of approximately 400,000 geometries we find that in the regime of perturbative control there are only a handful of distinct axion minima per geometry, despite there being infinitely many instanton contributions to the potential with unbounded charges. The ensemble we consider has numbers of axion fields ranging from 1 to 491, but the median number of distinct minima is 1, the mean number is 1.9 and the largest is 54. These small numbers of minima occur because the leading axion charge matrix is quite sparse, while the subleading corrections are increasingly exponentially suppressed as the charges increase. On their own, such potentials are nowhere near rich enough to be of interest anthropically. This is in stark contrast to potentials for which the charge matrix is less sparse or the hierarchies between the instanton contributions are less steep, where one can find $$ \mathcal{O}\left({10}^{500}\right) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>500</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> minima for $$ \mathcal{O}(500) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mn>500</mml:mn> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> axions. To generate a sufficiently large landscape from string compactifications our results indicate that one would need to rely on varying flux or topology, or to develop tools that allow one to go beyond the regime we can control with current techniques.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2025(2)
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT), Harvard University (US), Cornell University (US), Harvard University Press (US), International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (IN), Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe (IT), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), New York University (US), University of Göttingen (DE)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.