Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Osteosarcoma

The exploration of histopathological osteosarcoma data is a profitable technique to observe the pathological textures of osteosarcoma. Osteosarcoma classification is complex and inefficient due to inter-class similarities and variations. In this research, we employ two ML methods to classify OST: RF alias Random Forest and SVM alias Support Vector Machine. Sensitivity, Accuracy, F1-score, AUC, Kappa, and Specificity are the performance metrics used in the evaluation of ML models. Based on these classifiers, osteosarcoma can be classified as three categories which are explained in this work. The overall accuracy of the RF and SVM are 94.70% and 93.2% respectively. RF algorithm outperforms SVM algorithm with specificity 98.5%, F1 score 93.60%, sensitivity 92.30%, overall accuracy 94.70%, AUC 0.99 and Kappa 0.92.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmnwc63764.2024.10872030
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Osteosarcoma

B G Deepa, N Pooja, Chalamalasetti Lokesh, A Ayshwarya
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Osteosarcoma

B G Deepa, N Pooja, Chalamalasetti Lokesh, A Ayshwarya
article en

Abstract

The exploration of histopathological osteosarcoma data is a profitable technique to observe the pathological textures of osteosarcoma. Osteosarcoma classification is complex and inefficient due to inter-class similarities and variations. In this research, we employ two ML methods to classify OST: RF alias Random Forest and SVM alias Support Vector Machine. Sensitivity, Accuracy, F1-score, AUC, Kappa, and Specificity are the performance metrics used in the evaluation of ML models. Based on these classifiers, osteosarcoma can be classified as three categories which are explained in this work. The overall accuracy of the RF and SVM are 94.70% and 93.2% respectively. RF algorithm outperforms SVM algorithm with specificity 98.5%, F1 score 93.60%, sensitivity 92.30%, overall accuracy 94.70%, AUC 0.99 and Kappa 0.92.

Christ University (IN), REVA University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Osteosarcoma — B G Deepa, N Pooja, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS