Aftershock Area Assessment Based on the First Aftershocks at the Khibiny Deposits

Abstract—This paper examines the construction of an aftershock activity area in conditions of natural and mining-induced seismicity based after the data on the first aftershocks. The study area is apatite–nepheline deposits located in the southern part of the Khibiny massif. A significant number of variants of aftershock regions were investigated that differ in shape, location, and orientation. The size of the area has been determined by scaling based on physical and statistical characteristics calculated from both the main shock and the first aftershocks. The criterion based on an error diagram has been used to quantitatively compare a large number of different variants. As a result, the optimal area type has been selected, which showing the best results of the quantitative test based on seismicity data on the study area for 1996–2022. The technique can be used to predict the area of aftershock activity distribution at the Khibiny massif deposits after a natural–mining-induced earthquake based on operational processing data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1069351324700915
Primary Topic
Geological Studies and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aftershock Area Assessment Based on the First Aftershocks at the Khibiny Deposits

С. В. Баранов, A. Yu. Motorin
Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth
Geological Studies and Exploration
article

Aftershock Area Assessment Based on the First Aftershocks at the Khibiny Deposits

С. В. Баранов, A. Yu. Motorin
article en

Abstract

Abstract—This paper examines the construction of an aftershock activity area in conditions of natural and mining-induced seismicity based after the data on the first aftershocks. The study area is apatite–nepheline deposits located in the southern part of the Khibiny massif. A significant number of variants of aftershock regions were investigated that differ in shape, location, and orientation. The size of the area has been determined by scaling based on physical and statistical characteristics calculated from both the main shock and the first aftershocks. The criterion based on an error diagram has been used to quantitatively compare a large number of different variants. As a result, the optimal area type has been selected, which showing the best results of the quantitative test based on seismicity data on the study area for 1996–2022. The technique can be used to predict the area of aftershock activity distribution at the Khibiny massif deposits after a natural–mining-induced earthquake based on operational processing data.

Izvestiya Physics of the Solid EarthVol. 60(6)
Geophysical Survey (RU), Kirov State Medical Academy (RU), Kola Science Centre (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Geological Studies and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.