Reducing reliability bias in assessments of extreme weather risk using calibrating priors

Abstract. A number of recent climate studies have used univariate parametric statistical models to estimate return periods of extreme weather events based on the method of maximum likelihood. Using simulations over multiple training datasets, we find that using maximum likelihood gives predictions of extreme return levels that are exceeded more often than expected. For instance, when using the generalised extreme value distribution (GEVD) with 50 annual data values, fitted using maximum likelihood, we find that 200-year return levels are exceeded more than twice as often as expected; i.e. they are exceeded in more than 1 in 100 simulated years. This bias, which we refer to as a predictive coverage probability (PCP) bias, would be expected to lead to unreliable predictions. We review the theory related to Bayesian prediction using right Haar priors which gives an objective way to incorporate parameter uncertainty into predictions for some statistical models and which eliminates the bias. We consider a number of commonly used parametric statistical models and give the right Haar priors in each case. Where possible, we give analytical solutions for the resulting predictions. Where analytical solutions are not possible, we apply either an asymptotic approximation for the Bayesian prediction integral or ratio of uniforms sampling. For the fully parameterised GEVD and the generalised Pareto distribution with a known location parameter, neither of which have a right Haar prior, we test a number of methods and find one that gives big reductions in the PCP bias relative to maximum likelihood predictions. Finally, we revisit the De Bilt extreme temperature example considered in a number of previous studies and generate revised, and shorter, estimates for the return period of the 2018 heatwave. Software for fitting predictive distributions with parameter uncertainty has been developed by the first author and will be available as an R package.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in statistical climatology, meteorology and oceanography
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-11-1-2025
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing reliability bias in assessments of extreme weather risk using calibrating priors

Stephen Jewson, Trevor J. Sweeting, Lynne Jewson
5 citations
Advances in statistical climatology, meteorology and oceanography
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
6.63
article

Reducing reliability bias in assessments of extreme weather risk using calibrating priors

Stephen Jewson, Trevor J. Sweeting, Lynne Jewson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract. A number of recent climate studies have used univariate parametric statistical models to estimate return periods of extreme weather events based on the method of maximum likelihood. Using simulations over multiple training datasets, we find that using maximum likelihood gives predictions of extreme return levels that are exceeded more often than expected. For instance, when using the generalised extreme value distribution (GEVD) with 50 annual data values, fitted using maximum likelihood, we find that 200-year return levels are exceeded more than twice as often as expected; i.e. they are exceeded in more than 1 in 100 simulated years. This bias, which we refer to as a predictive coverage probability (PCP) bias, would be expected to lead to unreliable predictions. We review the theory related to Bayesian prediction using right Haar priors which gives an objective way to incorporate parameter uncertainty into predictions for some statistical models and which eliminates the bias. We consider a number of commonly used parametric statistical models and give the right Haar priors in each case. Where possible, we give analytical solutions for the resulting predictions. Where analytical solutions are not possible, we apply either an asymptotic approximation for the Bayesian prediction integral or ratio of uniforms sampling. For the fully parameterised GEVD and the generalised Pareto distribution with a known location parameter, neither of which have a right Haar prior, we test a number of methods and find one that gives big reductions in the PCP bias relative to maximum likelihood predictions. Finally, we revisit the De Bilt extreme temperature example considered in a number of previous studies and generate revised, and shorter, estimates for the return period of the 2018 heatwave. Software for fitting predictive distributions with parameter uncertainty has been developed by the first author and will be available as an R package.

Advances in statistical climatology, meteorology and oceanographyVol. 11(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), Bridge University (SS), LAMDA (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
6.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.