Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumour Detection

The detection and identification of brain tumors is vital for facilitating early diagnosis and enabling timely treatment of such conditions. This paper investigates the utilization of deep learning architectures, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [9], VGG [10], U-Net [7], Transfer Learning [11] and RU-Net [12] for tumors cerebral detected MRI. imagine The models are trained using the Kaggle dataset brain images for brain tumor detection dataset, which contains images labeled “yes” (tumor) and “no” (no tumor). The efficacy of each model is assessed according to parameters such as accuracy, loss and generalization. The outcomes indicate that the CNN achieved a test accuracy of 88. 23%, while Transfer Learning produced an accuracy of 82.35% on unseen data. The performance of the models is compared and suggestions for improvement are given, including adjustment and addition of data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/smart63812.2024.10882510
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumour Detection

Anuj Bhardwaj, Vanshika Sharma, Gunit Girdhar
2 citations
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.49
article

Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumour Detection

Anuj Bhardwaj, Vanshika Sharma, Gunit Girdhar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The detection and identification of brain tumors is vital for facilitating early diagnosis and enabling timely treatment of such conditions. This paper investigates the utilization of deep learning architectures, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [9], VGG [10], U-Net [7], Transfer Learning [11] and RU-Net [12] for tumors cerebral detected MRI. imagine The models are trained using the Kaggle dataset brain images for brain tumor detection dataset, which contains images labeled “yes” (tumor) and “no” (no tumor). The efficacy of each model is assessed according to parameters such as accuracy, loss and generalization. The outcomes indicate that the CNN achieved a test accuracy of 88. 23%, while Transfer Learning produced an accuracy of 82.35% on unseen data. The performance of the models is compared and suggestions for improvement are given, including adjustment and addition of data.

Chandigarh University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.