Groundwater Nitrate-Nitrite Modeling in a Grazed Hillslope with Agroforestry and Grass Buffers

Groundwater pollution negatively impacts aquatic ecosystems and human health. On the other hand, conservation practices can help reduce groundwater and surface water pollution. Baseflow from agricultural fields can be an important source of nitrate-nitrite (NN) loads in lakes and other surface water bodies. Riparian agroforestry buffers can be an effective barrier between groundwater NN and surface water bodies. The study aimed to determine the effects of agroforestry buffers and widths on groundwater nitrate-nitrite (NN) exports from an agricultural grazing area into a farm lake using flow and solute transport models. The flow and solute models were calibrated and validated for the weather and land use (grazing) conditions observed during the monitoring period, and these conditions were repeated throughout the 10-year projection. The calibration and validation of the flow and solute transport models were satisfactory, yielding determination coefficients R2 > 0.95 and Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients > 0.94. The area of study was modeled under four scenarios: tree-only buffers [cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bortr. ex Marsh.)]; grass-only buffers ([Tall fescue Schedonorus phoenix (Scop.) Holub, Red clover (Trifolium pretense L.), and Lespedeza (Lespedeza Michx)]); tree + grass buffers (a combination of the same tree and grass species of the other two scenarios; and a no-buffer scenario. The tree-only, grass-only, and tree + grass buffers reduced the total mass of NN discharged from the study unit to the lake by 98%, 97%, and 99%, respectively, compared to the no-buffer scenario. Doubling the buffer width from 15 m to 30 m decreased the NN discharge to the lake by 16-fold. Moreover, 7.5 m wide buffers had up to nine times greater NN discharge than 15 m buffers. Results show that agroforestry buffers with trees and grasses in riparian areas significantly remove NN exports in groundwater from agricultural fields, protecting the environment and human health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050608
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Groundwater Nitrate-Nitrite Modeling in a Grazed Hillslope with Agroforestry and Grass Buffers

Miguel Salceda, Martin S. Appold, Ranjith P. Udawatta
2 citations
Water
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
2.67
article

Groundwater Nitrate-Nitrite Modeling in a Grazed Hillslope with Agroforestry and Grass Buffers

Miguel Salceda, Martin S. Appold, Ranjith P. Udawatta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Groundwater pollution negatively impacts aquatic ecosystems and human health. On the other hand, conservation practices can help reduce groundwater and surface water pollution. Baseflow from agricultural fields can be an important source of nitrate-nitrite (NN) loads in lakes and other surface water bodies. Riparian agroforestry buffers can be an effective barrier between groundwater NN and surface water bodies. The study aimed to determine the effects of agroforestry buffers and widths on groundwater nitrate-nitrite (NN) exports from an agricultural grazing area into a farm lake using flow and solute transport models. The flow and solute models were calibrated and validated for the weather and land use (grazing) conditions observed during the monitoring period, and these conditions were repeated throughout the 10-year projection. The calibration and validation of the flow and solute transport models were satisfactory, yielding determination coefficients R2 > 0.95 and Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients > 0.94. The area of study was modeled under four scenarios: tree-only buffers [cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bortr. ex Marsh.)]; grass-only buffers ([Tall fescue Schedonorus phoenix (Scop.) Holub, Red clover (Trifolium pretense L.), and Lespedeza (Lespedeza Michx)]); tree + grass buffers (a combination of the same tree and grass species of the other two scenarios; and a no-buffer scenario. The tree-only, grass-only, and tree + grass buffers reduced the total mass of NN discharged from the study unit to the lake by 98%, 97%, and 99%, respectively, compared to the no-buffer scenario. Doubling the buffer width from 15 m to 30 m decreased the NN discharge to the lake by 16-fold. Moreover, 7.5 m wide buffers had up to nine times greater NN discharge than 15 m buffers. Results show that agroforestry buffers with trees and grasses in riparian areas significantly remove NN exports in groundwater from agricultural fields, protecting the environment and human health.

WaterVol. 17(5)
Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (PA), Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (PA), University of Missouri (US), Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá (PA)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Missouri, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Agroforestry, University of Missouri
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.