Comparison of Barrett and Kane keratoconic formulae in eyes with only posterior corneal changes

Abstract PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Barrett Universal II (UII), Barrett total K, Barrett True-K keratoconus (KC), Kane, and Kane KC formulae in eyes with only posterior corneal changes. METHODS: A retrospective case series of eyes with normal anterior keratometry with only posterior corneal changes, aged between 45 and 75 years, and had undergone cataract surgery was analyzed. Subjects with any systemic illness, previous corneal surgery, corneal opacity, previous history of corneal inflammation, and subjects with missing data were excluded. For all patients, intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations were done using Barrett UII, Barrett total K, Barrett True-K KC predicted, Barrett True-K KC measured, Kane, and Kane KC formulae. For all patients, mean absolute error, median absolute error (MedAE), and percentage of eyes with absolute error spherical equivalent within 0.25D, 0.5D, and >0.51D were noted. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes of 13 patients with a mean ± standard deviation age of 61.92 ± 7.08 years had undergone cataract surgery. The MedAE was least with predicted Barrett True-K KC (0.26), whereas it was highest with Barrett total K (0.31). However, the Kruskal–Wallis test did not reveal any statistical significant difference in absolute error among the various formulae. Predicted Barrett KC, Kane, and Kane KC each resulted in the highest percentage of eyes (47.62%) within ±0.25 diopters error. Overall, Barrett UII, measured Barrett KC, Kane, and Kane KC had the highest percentage of eyes (76.19%) within ± 0.50 diopters error. CONCLUSION: This study has reported the efficacy of various IOL power calculations’ formulae in unique cases where anterior corneas were normal and had the abnormal posterior cornea resulting in anterior–posterior asymmetry. Although clinically predicted Barrett True-K KC resulted in the least absolute error, statistically, it did not show any edge over other formulae including Kane KC in eyes with only posterior corneal changes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_142_24
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Barrett and Kane keratoconic formulae in eyes with only posterior corneal changes

Vaishal P. Kenia, Onkar H. Pirdankar, Raj V. Kenia, Nagalaxmi Mudaliya
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparison of Barrett and Kane keratoconic formulae in eyes with only posterior corneal changes

Vaishal P. Kenia, Onkar H. Pirdankar, Raj V. Kenia, Nagalaxmi Mudaliya
article en

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Barrett Universal II (UII), Barrett total K, Barrett True-K keratoconus (KC), Kane, and Kane KC formulae in eyes with only posterior corneal changes. METHODS: A retrospective case series of eyes with normal anterior keratometry with only posterior corneal changes, aged between 45 and 75 years, and had undergone cataract surgery was analyzed. Subjects with any systemic illness, previous corneal surgery, corneal opacity, previous history of corneal inflammation, and subjects with missing data were excluded. For all patients, intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations were done using Barrett UII, Barrett total K, Barrett True-K KC predicted, Barrett True-K KC measured, Kane, and Kane KC formulae. For all patients, mean absolute error, median absolute error (MedAE), and percentage of eyes with absolute error spherical equivalent within 0.25D, 0.5D, and >0.51D were noted. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes of 13 patients with a mean ± standard deviation age of 61.92 ± 7.08 years had undergone cataract surgery. The MedAE was least with predicted Barrett True-K KC (0.26), whereas it was highest with Barrett total K (0.31). However, the Kruskal–Wallis test did not reveal any statistical significant difference in absolute error among the various formulae. Predicted Barrett KC, Kane, and Kane KC each resulted in the highest percentage of eyes (47.62%) within ±0.25 diopters error. Overall, Barrett UII, measured Barrett KC, Kane, and Kane KC had the highest percentage of eyes (76.19%) within ± 0.50 diopters error. CONCLUSION: This study has reported the efficacy of various IOL power calculations’ formulae in unique cases where anterior corneas were normal and had the abnormal posterior cornea resulting in anterior–posterior asymmetry. Although clinically predicted Barrett True-K KC resulted in the least absolute error, statistically, it did not show any edge over other formulae including Kane KC in eyes with only posterior corneal changes.

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.