Computing Paradigms in Smart Grids 2.0: Exploring Computing Models and Cybersecurity Challenges

Smart Grid 2.0 represents a significant advancement in energy systems, propelled by innovations such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain technology, and 5G telecommunications. These technologies enable dynamic and intelligent energy management while introducing new challenges in data processing and cybersecurity. This paper examines the role of various computing models—Cloud, Fog, Edge, and Distributed computing—within the framework of Smart Grids 2.0, emphasizing their impact on system efficiency and security. We first define each computing paradigm and its specific applications in smart grids. Next, we assess the security risks and computational challenges associated with these models, offering a comparative analysis of their performance in addressing concerns such as latency, scalability, and susceptibility to cyber-attacks. Proposed solutions, including encryption techniques and real-time threat detection, are discussed to strengthen the resilience of smart grids. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, particularly in advancing cybersecurity measures and optimizing data processing in an increasingly interconnected energy infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icis64839.2024.10887444
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computing Paradigms in Smart Grids 2.0: Exploring Computing Models and Cybersecurity Challenges

S. Mohammadali Zanjani, Gevork B. Gharehpetian, Hossein Shahinzadeh, Saiedeh Mehrabani-Najafabadi et al.
5 citations
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
1.64
article

Computing Paradigms in Smart Grids 2.0: Exploring Computing Models and Cybersecurity Challenges

S. Mohammadali Zanjani, Gevork B. Gharehpetian, Hossein Shahinzadeh, Saiedeh Mehrabani-Najafabadi, Amir-Emad Poursaeid, Ehsan Etemadnia
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Smart Grid 2.0 represents a significant advancement in energy systems, propelled by innovations such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain technology, and 5G telecommunications. These technologies enable dynamic and intelligent energy management while introducing new challenges in data processing and cybersecurity. This paper examines the role of various computing models—Cloud, Fog, Edge, and Distributed computing—within the framework of Smart Grids 2.0, emphasizing their impact on system efficiency and security. We first define each computing paradigm and its specific applications in smart grids. Next, we assess the security risks and computational challenges associated with these models, offering a comparative analysis of their performance in addressing concerns such as latency, scalability, and susceptibility to cyber-attacks. Proposed solutions, including encryption techniques and real-time threat detection, are discussed to strengthen the resilience of smart grids. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, particularly in advancing cybersecurity measures and optimizing data processing in an increasingly interconnected energy infrastructure.

Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), Islamic Azad University of Najafabad (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
1.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computing Paradigms in Smart Grids 2.0: Exploring Computing Models and Cybersecurity Challenges — S. Mohammadali Zanjani, Gevork B. Gharehpetian, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS