Asexual versus sexual women: a test–retest study on differences in brain activity

Asexuality has a prevalence of approximately 1% in the population and should not be confused with hypoactive sexual desire disorder as defined in the DSM-5. Asexuality is characterized by minimal to no sexual attraction to others. The neural correlates of asexuality remain largely unknown, and the test-retest reliability of sexually induced brain activity is still elusive. In this functional MRI study, we used the Asexual Identification Scale to identify 14 asexual women (mean score ~ 46) and 21 sexual women (mean score ~ 14). We modeled brain activity in response to sexual stimuli using the canonical hemodynamic response function and performed voxel-wise test-retest reliability analysis on contrast weight maps. Additionally, we applied pattern recognition methods to distinguish asexual from sexual women. The voxel-wise test-retest reliability of brain activity in response to sexual stimuli was remarkably robust for sexuality relevant brain areas [mean ICC(2,1) = 0.66]. The conjunction analysis comparing sexual stimuli to baseline showed that group brain activity was reproducible at a Bonferroni-corrected P value of 1.78e -6 . The direct contrast between asexual and sexual women yielded no significant differences at the single-voxel level. A support vector machine, however, identified 71% ( P < 0.03) of asexual and sexual women correctly when test and retest runs were combined. In conclusion, although our sample size is small, our findings suggest that differences between asexual and sexual women may have their neural roots in subtle variations in brain activity across extensive brain regions, which might be identified using classification methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroreport
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0000000000002147
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asexual versus sexual women: a test–retest study on differences in brain activity

Guilherme Wood, Jan Willem Koten, Karl Koschutnig, Lisa L. Mathis et al.
Neuroreport
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Asexual versus sexual women: a test–retest study on differences in brain activity

Guilherme Wood, Jan Willem Koten, Karl Koschutnig, Lisa L. Mathis, Hannes Nessling
article en

Abstract

Asexuality has a prevalence of approximately 1% in the population and should not be confused with hypoactive sexual desire disorder as defined in the DSM-5. Asexuality is characterized by minimal to no sexual attraction to others. The neural correlates of asexuality remain largely unknown, and the test-retest reliability of sexually induced brain activity is still elusive. In this functional MRI study, we used the Asexual Identification Scale to identify 14 asexual women (mean score ~ 46) and 21 sexual women (mean score ~ 14). We modeled brain activity in response to sexual stimuli using the canonical hemodynamic response function and performed voxel-wise test-retest reliability analysis on contrast weight maps. Additionally, we applied pattern recognition methods to distinguish asexual from sexual women. The voxel-wise test-retest reliability of brain activity in response to sexual stimuli was remarkably robust for sexuality relevant brain areas [mean ICC(2,1) = 0.66]. The conjunction analysis comparing sexual stimuli to baseline showed that group brain activity was reproducible at a Bonferroni-corrected P value of 1.78e -6 . The direct contrast between asexual and sexual women yielded no significant differences at the single-voxel level. A support vector machine, however, identified 71% ( P < 0.03) of asexual and sexual women correctly when test and retest runs were combined. In conclusion, although our sample size is small, our findings suggest that differences between asexual and sexual women may have their neural roots in subtle variations in brain activity across extensive brain regions, which might be identified using classification methods.

NeuroreportVol. 36(5)
University of Graz (AT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Asexual versus sexual women: a test–retest study on differences in brain activity — Guilherme Wood, Jan Willem Koten, et al. · Neuroreport (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS