Trachelectomy and Cerclage Placement as Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancer—An Expert Survey

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is a standard practice for managing early stage cervical cancer, yet significant variation exists in clinical approaches worldwide. Our objective was to ascertain current practices and preferences for cerclage use among expert centers globally regarding FSS in patients with early stage cervical cancer. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from May to July 2023 involving expert centers identified through their scientific contributions and participation in international workgroups and conferences.. The survey, comprising 27 questions, evaluated existing practices in FSS. <b>Results</b>: Out of the centers surveyed, 21 (36.2%) gynecologic oncologists responded. For tumors <2 cm, 86% of centers preferred radical trachelectomy, primarily via the vaginal approach, while 13.6% favored a simple trachelectomy. Three experts preferred simple trachelectomy (13.6%). For tumors >2 cm, 47.6% utilized neoadjuvant chemotherapy before trachelectomy. Others did not offer FSS or performed an abdominal radical trachelectomy. Over time, there has been a shift towards less radical surgeries for tumors <2 cm and increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for larger tumors. Some abandoned the minimally invasive surgical approach. Nearly all experts (90.5%) placed a cerclage immediately following trachelectomy. <b>Conclusions</b>: The majority of experts opt for radical trachelectomy in early stage cervical cancer, with immediate cerclage placement being a common practice. However, considerable international variations highlight the urgent need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize treatment strategies, balancing oncological safety with fertility outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15030077
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trachelectomy and Cerclage Placement as Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancer—An Expert Survey

Peter Hillemanns, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Glauco Baiocchi, Luc R.C.W. van Lonkhuijzen et al.
4 citations
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
8.23
article

Trachelectomy and Cerclage Placement as Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancer—An Expert Survey

Peter Hillemanns, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Glauco Baiocchi, Luc R.C.W. van Lonkhuijzen, Reitan Ribeiro, Cornelis G. Gerestein, Joo‐Hyun Nam, Maaike A. van der Aa, Jan Persson, Karlijn Cornel, Denis Querleu, Ali Kucukmetin, Philippe Morice, Jogchum Beltman, Allan Covens, Anke B. Smits, Mieke Ten Eikelder, Petra L.M. Zusterzeel, Myriam Perrotta, Blanca Gil‐Ibáñez, Marie Plante, Henrik Falconer, Janneke T. Wolswinkel, Christhardt Köhler, Christina Fotopoulou, László Ungár
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is a standard practice for managing early stage cervical cancer, yet significant variation exists in clinical approaches worldwide. Our objective was to ascertain current practices and preferences for cerclage use among expert centers globally regarding FSS in patients with early stage cervical cancer. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from May to July 2023 involving expert centers identified through their scientific contributions and participation in international workgroups and conferences.. The survey, comprising 27 questions, evaluated existing practices in FSS. <b>Results</b>: Out of the centers surveyed, 21 (36.2%) gynecologic oncologists responded. For tumors <2 cm, 86% of centers preferred radical trachelectomy, primarily via the vaginal approach, while 13.6% favored a simple trachelectomy. Three experts preferred simple trachelectomy (13.6%). For tumors >2 cm, 47.6% utilized neoadjuvant chemotherapy before trachelectomy. Others did not offer FSS or performed an abdominal radical trachelectomy. Over time, there has been a shift towards less radical surgeries for tumors <2 cm and increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for larger tumors. Some abandoned the minimally invasive surgical approach. Nearly all experts (90.5%) placed a cerclage immediately following trachelectomy. <b>Conclusions</b>: The majority of experts opt for radical trachelectomy in early stage cervical cancer, with immediate cerclage placement being a common practice. However, considerable international variations highlight the urgent need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize treatment strategies, balancing oncological safety with fertility outcomes.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 15(3)
Ulsan College (KR), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Inserm (FR), University of Toronto (CA), Lund University (SE), Utrecht University (NL), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Buda Health Center (HU), Asan Medical Center (KR), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), AC Camargo Hospital (BR), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), University of Ulsan (KR), Asklepios Klinik Altona (DE), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), Hospital Erasto Gaertner (BR), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB), DRK Kliniken Berlin (DE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Université Laval (CA), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), Imperial College London (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
8.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.