Exploring MEC Server Strategy in Blockchain Networks: Mining for Mobile Users or for Self

Blockchain-based decentralized applications (DApps) offer enhanced security and decentralization features; nevertheless, their maintenance demands substantial computational resources and poses challenges for deployment in mobile networks. To address this, a number of studies have explored offloading blockchain mining tasks from mobile users to mobile edge computing (MEC) servers. However, the existing literature overlooks the fact that MEC servers can not only mine for mobile users but also mine for themselves, potentially explaining why MEC mining offloading has not gained broad acceptance within the industry. In this work, we exploit a more practical case and rethink the question of whether MEC servers lease computing power to mobile users by taking into account that MEC servers can mine for themselves. We establish a game model and apply backward induction to analytically characterize Nash equilibria for mining strategies adopted by MEC and mobile users. Our findings suggest that, if MEC can mine for self, MEC would mine for mobile users only under specific conditions where mobile users possess superior information gathering capability (at least better than the MEC server) or the whole blockchain system exhibits significant network value. We further provide a series of simulations to verify our conclusion and illustrate the impact of network parameters on the strategies of both sides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2025.3544311
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring MEC Server Strategy in Blockchain Networks: Mining for Mobile Users or for Self

Weihang Cao, Xiqi Gao, Xintong Ling, Jiaheng Wang et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
9.74
article

Exploring MEC Server Strategy in Blockchain Networks: Mining for Mobile Users or for Self

Weihang Cao, Xiqi Gao, Xintong Ling, Jiaheng Wang, Zhi Ding, Mingkai Chen, Rui Jiang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Blockchain-based decentralized applications (DApps) offer enhanced security and decentralization features; nevertheless, their maintenance demands substantial computational resources and poses challenges for deployment in mobile networks. To address this, a number of studies have explored offloading blockchain mining tasks from mobile users to mobile edge computing (MEC) servers. However, the existing literature overlooks the fact that MEC servers can not only mine for mobile users but also mine for themselves, potentially explaining why MEC mining offloading has not gained broad acceptance within the industry. In this work, we exploit a more practical case and rethink the question of whether MEC servers lease computing power to mobile users by taking into account that MEC servers can mine for themselves. We establish a game model and apply backward induction to analytically characterize Nash equilibria for mining strategies adopted by MEC and mobile users. Our findings suggest that, if MEC can mine for self, MEC would mine for mobile users only under specific conditions where mobile users possess superior information gathering capability (at least better than the MEC server) or the whole blockchain system exhibits significant network value. We further provide a series of simulations to verify our conclusion and illustrate the impact of network parameters on the strategies of both sides.

IEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingVol. 24(7)
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Southeast University (CN), University of California, Davis (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
9.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.