Strategies for e-Assessments in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly tools like ChatGPT, is reshaping educational landscapes by enabling students to generate responses that closely mimic human-written answers. This development presents both opportunities and challenges for e-assessments, especially concerning academic integrity and the authenticity of student learning outcomes. Traditional assessment methods, which often emphasize memorization and standardized testing, are proving insufficient in this new context, as they may not effectively measure higher-order skills like critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving. This study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) to investigate adaptive e-assessment strategies in higher education that address the integrity challenges posed by generative AI while supporting meaningful learning. Through an in-depth analysis of recent literature on e-assessment practices and AI integration, this study identifies key adaptive strategies such as randomized questioning, project-based assessments, open-book exams, and AI-enhanced plagiarism detection. The findings reveal that while generative AI complicates the assessment process, it also provides an impetus for rethinking assessment design in ways that promote application-based knowledge and discourage cheating. By advocating for a shift towards assessments that evaluate critical skills rather than rote knowledge, this study proposes a framework that can support educators in creating robust, integrity-focused e-assessments. This research contributes to the evolving discourse on educational assessment, offering practical recommendations for institutions aiming to balance the benefits of AI-enhanced learning with the need for fair and accurate assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.7.3477
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
58.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for e-Assessments in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Tapiwa Gundu
14 citations
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning
Scientific Computing and Data Management
58.36
article

Strategies for e-Assessments in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Tapiwa Gundu
article en
14 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly tools like ChatGPT, is reshaping educational landscapes by enabling students to generate responses that closely mimic human-written answers. This development presents both opportunities and challenges for e-assessments, especially concerning academic integrity and the authenticity of student learning outcomes. Traditional assessment methods, which often emphasize memorization and standardized testing, are proving insufficient in this new context, as they may not effectively measure higher-order skills like critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving. This study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) to investigate adaptive e-assessment strategies in higher education that address the integrity challenges posed by generative AI while supporting meaningful learning. Through an in-depth analysis of recent literature on e-assessment practices and AI integration, this study identifies key adaptive strategies such as randomized questioning, project-based assessments, open-book exams, and AI-enhanced plagiarism detection. The findings reveal that while generative AI complicates the assessment process, it also provides an impetus for rethinking assessment design in ways that promote application-based knowledge and discourage cheating. By advocating for a shift towards assessments that evaluate critical skills rather than rote knowledge, this study proposes a framework that can support educators in creating robust, integrity-focused e-assessments. This research contributes to the evolving discourse on educational assessment, offering practical recommendations for institutions aiming to balance the benefits of AI-enhanced learning with the need for fair and accurate assessments.

The Electronic Journal of e-LearningVol. 22(7)
Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
58.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies for e-Assessments in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence — Tapiwa Gundu · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS