Evaluation and Validation of Different Integrated Pest Management Modules for Field Pea

This research was carried out during rabi (November-March) 2020–21 at Agronomy Instructional Farm, S. D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat, India to evaluate the efficacy of seven different Integrated Pest Management (IPM) modules against insect-pests of field pea. Five IPM modules were tested for their efficacy against insect-pest. The result revealed that the module M4 (Border crop with chickpea+treating seeds by imidacloprid 600FS @ 3 ml kg-1 seed+yellow sticky trap @one module-1+sprays of azadirachtin 1500 ppm @ 40 ml 10 l-1 water+HaNPV 250 LE @ 10 ml 10 l-1 of water+profenophos 50 EC @ 10 ml 10 l-1 water) exhibited significantly minimum population of 1.47 aphid 10 cm-1 shoot, 1.00 leafhopper trifoliate-1, 0.62 whitefly trifoliate-1, 0.08 larva plant-1 with lowest pod borer damage (0.30%) and thus proved to be most effective module which was at par with module M1. The highest field pea seed yield (1250 kg ha-1) was also harvested from module M4. The maximum (42.04%) increase in yield was obtained in the plots framed with M4 followed by module M1. The avoidable losses in field pea yield were minimum (9.36%) in module M1. The highest (`Rs. 87,500 ha-1) gross realization was obtained from the plots framed with module M4. The highest Protection Cost: Benefit Ratio (PCBR) was obtained in module M4 (1:3.56) which clearly indicated that module M4 was also the most economical module amongst all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2025.5877
Primary Topic
Agricultural pest management studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and Validation of Different Integrated Pest Management Modules for Field Pea

H. R. Gothi, A. R. Prajapati, B. M. Padhiyar, J. V. Chauhan
International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management
Agricultural pest management studies
article

Evaluation and Validation of Different Integrated Pest Management Modules for Field Pea

H. R. Gothi, A. R. Prajapati, B. M. Padhiyar, J. V. Chauhan
article en

Abstract

This research was carried out during rabi (November-March) 2020–21 at Agronomy Instructional Farm, S. D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat, India to evaluate the efficacy of seven different Integrated Pest Management (IPM) modules against insect-pests of field pea. Five IPM modules were tested for their efficacy against insect-pest. The result revealed that the module M4 (Border crop with chickpea+treating seeds by imidacloprid 600FS @ 3 ml kg-1 seed+yellow sticky trap @one module-1+sprays of azadirachtin 1500 ppm @ 40 ml 10 l-1 water+HaNPV 250 LE @ 10 ml 10 l-1 of water+profenophos 50 EC @ 10 ml 10 l-1 water) exhibited significantly minimum population of 1.47 aphid 10 cm-1 shoot, 1.00 leafhopper trifoliate-1, 0.62 whitefly trifoliate-1, 0.08 larva plant-1 with lowest pod borer damage (0.30%) and thus proved to be most effective module which was at par with module M1. The highest field pea seed yield (1250 kg ha-1) was also harvested from module M4. The maximum (42.04%) increase in yield was obtained in the plots framed with M4 followed by module M1. The avoidable losses in field pea yield were minimum (9.36%) in module M1. The highest (`Rs. 87,500 ha-1) gross realization was obtained from the plots framed with module M4. The highest Protection Cost: Benefit Ratio (PCBR) was obtained in module M4 (1:3.56) which clearly indicated that module M4 was also the most economical module amongst all.

International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress ManagementVol. 16(Feb, 2)
Navsari Agricultural University (IN), Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Agricultural pest management studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation and Validation of Different Integrated Pest Management Modules for Field Pea — H. R. Gothi, A. R. Prajapati, et al. · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS