The Beauty of Auditor Selection: The Effects of Auditor Attractiveness and Auditee Goals on Procuring Governmental Audit Services

ABSTRACT Baugh, Hallman, and Kachelmeier (2022) archivally find audit committees with no Big 4-experienced members are more likely to favor attractive partners, suggesting attractiveness influences auditor selection. We extend Baugh et al. (2022) by investigating the conditions in which attractiveness influences auditor selection. Using 140 finance directors as participants, we experimentally examine if auditor attractiveness affects hiring recommendations, and whether auditee goals moderate the effects of attractiveness. We find when the auditee’s goal is “meticulous,” recommendations are similar across conditions. However, when the goal is “check-the-box,” participants are more (less) likely to recommend more (less) attractive auditors. In the “check-the-box” condition we also find attractive auditors are more likely to be recommended compared to the baseline (no photo), indicating a “beauty premium.” Our study has implications for audit firms, auditees, and regulators by identifying a factor that contributes to auditees’ susceptibility to beauty bias, which can ultimately affect audit quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Research in Accounting
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2024-044
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Beauty of Auditor Selection: The Effects of Auditor Attractiveness and Auditee Goals on Procuring Governmental Audit Services

Chad M. Stefaniak, Jennifer Kahle Schafer, M. Messina
1 citations
Behavioral Research in Accounting
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

The Beauty of Auditor Selection: The Effects of Auditor Attractiveness and Auditee Goals on Procuring Governmental Audit Services

Chad M. Stefaniak, Jennifer Kahle Schafer, M. Messina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Baugh, Hallman, and Kachelmeier (2022) archivally find audit committees with no Big 4-experienced members are more likely to favor attractive partners, suggesting attractiveness influences auditor selection. We extend Baugh et al. (2022) by investigating the conditions in which attractiveness influences auditor selection. Using 140 finance directors as participants, we experimentally examine if auditor attractiveness affects hiring recommendations, and whether auditee goals moderate the effects of attractiveness. We find when the auditee’s goal is “meticulous,” recommendations are similar across conditions. However, when the goal is “check-the-box,” participants are more (less) likely to recommend more (less) attractive auditors. In the “check-the-box” condition we also find attractive auditors are more likely to be recommended compared to the baseline (no photo), indicating a “beauty premium.” Our study has implications for audit firms, auditees, and regulators by identifying a factor that contributes to auditees’ susceptibility to beauty bias, which can ultimately affect audit quality.

Behavioral Research in Accounting
University of South Carolina (US), Kennesaw State University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.