Advanced predictive machine and deep learning models for round-ended CFST column

Confined columns, such as round-ended concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns, are integral to modern infrastructure due to their high load-bearing capacity and structural efficiency. The primary objective of this study is to develop accurate, data-driven approaches for predicting the axial load-carrying capacity (P<sub>cc</sub>​) of these columns and to benchmark their performance against existing analytical solutions. Using an extensive dataset of 200 CFST stub column tests, this research evaluates three machine learning (ML) models - LightGBM, XGBoost, and CatBoost - and three deep learning (DL) models - Deep Neural Network (DNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Key input features include concrete strength, column length, cross-sectional dimensions, steel tube thickness, and yield strength, which were analysed to uncover underlying relationships. The results indicate that CatBoost delivers the highest predictive accuracy, achieving an RMSE of 396.50 kN and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.932, surpassing XGBoost (RMSE: 449.57 kN, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.906) and LightGBM (RMSE: 449.57 kN, R2: 0.916). Deep learning models were less effective, with the DNN attaining an RMSE of 496.19 kN and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.958, while the LSTM underperformed substantially (RMSE: 2010.46 kN, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.891). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identified cross-sectional width as the most critical feature, contributing positively to capacity, and column length as a significant negative influencer. A user-friendly, Python-based interface was also developed, enabling real-time predictions for practical engineering applications. Comparison with 10 analytical models demonstrates that these traditional methods, though deterministic, struggle to capture the nonlinear interactions inherent in CFST columns, thus yielding lower accuracy and higher variability. In contrast, the data-driven models presented here offer robust, adaptable, and interpretable solutions, underscoring their potential to transform design and analysis practices for CFST columns, ultimately fostering safer and more efficient structural systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90648-2
Citations
26
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced predictive machine and deep learning models for round-ended CFST column

Haytham F. Isleem, Ishan Jha, Mohammad Khishe, Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy et al.
26 citations
Scientific Reports
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
24.78
article

Advanced predictive machine and deep learning models for round-ended CFST column

Haytham F. Isleem, Ishan Jha, Mohammad Khishe, Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy, Feng Shen, Walaa J. K. Almoghayer
article en
26 citations

Abstract

Confined columns, such as round-ended concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns, are integral to modern infrastructure due to their high load-bearing capacity and structural efficiency. The primary objective of this study is to develop accurate, data-driven approaches for predicting the axial load-carrying capacity (P<sub>cc</sub>​) of these columns and to benchmark their performance against existing analytical solutions. Using an extensive dataset of 200 CFST stub column tests, this research evaluates three machine learning (ML) models - LightGBM, XGBoost, and CatBoost - and three deep learning (DL) models - Deep Neural Network (DNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Key input features include concrete strength, column length, cross-sectional dimensions, steel tube thickness, and yield strength, which were analysed to uncover underlying relationships. The results indicate that CatBoost delivers the highest predictive accuracy, achieving an RMSE of 396.50 kN and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.932, surpassing XGBoost (RMSE: 449.57 kN, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.906) and LightGBM (RMSE: 449.57 kN, R2: 0.916). Deep learning models were less effective, with the DNN attaining an RMSE of 496.19 kN and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.958, while the LSTM underperformed substantially (RMSE: 2010.46 kN, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.891). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identified cross-sectional width as the most critical feature, contributing positively to capacity, and column length as a significant negative influencer. A user-friendly, Python-based interface was also developed, enabling real-time predictions for practical engineering applications. Comparison with 10 analytical models demonstrates that these traditional methods, though deterministic, struggle to capture the nonlinear interactions inherent in CFST columns, thus yielding lower accuracy and higher variability. In contrast, the data-driven models presented here offer robust, adaptable, and interpretable solutions, underscoring their potential to transform design and analysis practices for CFST columns, ultimately fostering safer and more efficient structural systems.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Huaqiao University (CN), Damietta University (EG), Applied Science Private University (JO), Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Jadara University (JO), Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Iranshahr University (IR), University of York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
24.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.