Quantum Particle Swarm Optimisation Proportional–Derivative Control for Trajectory Tracking of a Car-like Mobile Robot

The goal of this research is to formulate and compare two algorithms, classical particle swarm optimisation (PSO) and quantum PSO (QPSO), for optimising the motion of a car-like mobile robot. Both algorithms are evaluated on the basis of their reduction and stabilisation of the root mean square error (RMSE) between the robot’s desired and actual trajectories. An implementation of the robot’s dynamic motion is provided. The robot’s mass and inertia are considered. The robot’s settings and the viscosity of the surroundings present a few obstacles to following the specified path. For each algorithm, the proportional (Kp) and derivative (Kd) parameters of the controller are optimised, and the convergence speeds and stabilities of the controllers are compared. The results show that both algorithms perform comparably. However, the QPSO method converges faster and is more stable at optimal Kp and Kd values. The ramifications of this research extend beyond trajectory tracking. Enhanced optimisation approaches can lead to higher performance in a variety of robotic systems, including autonomous cars, drones, and automation systems, by employing advanced quantum algorithms, such as QPSO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14050832
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum Particle Swarm Optimisation Proportional–Derivative Control for Trajectory Tracking of a Car-like Mobile Robot

Nadjet Zioui, Mohamed Tadjine, Joslin Numbi
7 citations
Electronics
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
8.93
article

Quantum Particle Swarm Optimisation Proportional–Derivative Control for Trajectory Tracking of a Car-like Mobile Robot

Nadjet Zioui, Mohamed Tadjine, Joslin Numbi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The goal of this research is to formulate and compare two algorithms, classical particle swarm optimisation (PSO) and quantum PSO (QPSO), for optimising the motion of a car-like mobile robot. Both algorithms are evaluated on the basis of their reduction and stabilisation of the root mean square error (RMSE) between the robot’s desired and actual trajectories. An implementation of the robot’s dynamic motion is provided. The robot’s mass and inertia are considered. The robot’s settings and the viscosity of the surroundings present a few obstacles to following the specified path. For each algorithm, the proportional (Kp) and derivative (Kd) parameters of the controller are optimised, and the convergence speeds and stabilities of the controllers are compared. The results show that both algorithms perform comparably. However, the QPSO method converges faster and is more stable at optimal Kp and Kd values. The ramifications of this research extend beyond trajectory tracking. Enhanced optimisation approaches can lead to higher performance in a variety of robotic systems, including autonomous cars, drones, and automation systems, by employing advanced quantum algorithms, such as QPSO.

ElectronicsVol. 14(5)
Polytechnic School of Algiers (DZ), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantum Particle Swarm Optimisation Proportional–Derivative Control for Trajectory Tracking of a Car-like Mobile Robot — Nadjet Zioui, Mohamed Tadjine, et al. · Electronics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS