Comparison of PSA Response to Generic Versus Innovator (Zytiga) Formulations of Abiraterone in Metastatic CRPC: A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract Introduction Abiraterone acetate has been shown to enhance overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Presently, multiple generic brands of abiraterone are accessible in India. Nevertheless, evidence supporting the clinical equivalence of these generics when compared to the innovator has not been established, and thus, questions regarding their quality persist. Objectives This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients receiving generic or innovator (Zytiga) abiraterone for mCRPC. Materials and Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, comparative study. All relevant data from selected cases were collected from the hospital's electronic medical record (EMR). Patients with mCRPC, treated with either innovator or generic abiraterone from 2010 to 2019 and followed up until disease progression/death, were included. Patients who switched between generic and reference brands and vice versa were excluded. Patients in both arms were matched for prior treatment with docetaxel (yes/no), age at cancer diagnosis (>60, ≤60 years), and total Gleason's score (≥8, <8), in a ratio of 1:5. The primary outcome was to assess the difference in PSA nadir between the two study groups. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v.21 and GraphPad Prism 8.0.2. Results Out of the 114 patients enrolled, 10 patients received Zytiga (innovator), and the remaining received generic abiraterone. No statistically significant difference was observed in the median PSA nadir between the generic and innovator arms: 20.5 versus 88.5 ng/mL (p = 0.293). Patients in the generic group exhibited a similar median rPFS compared to the innovator group: 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.68–11.31 months) versus 9.0 months (95% CI: 0–18.6 months), respectively (p = 0.539). The median time to PSA nadir was similar (3 months) between the two groups. The proportion of patients showing a PSA response at day 90 did not significantly differ between the two groups, with p = 0.38. The number of adverse events of any grade was comparable between the study groups, although grade 3/4 events were numerically higher in the generic group. Conclusion Generic abiraterone demonstrates a clinical response similar to that of Zytiga. Our findings strongly support the use of generic abiraterone in patients with mCRPC. The potential economic benefits of this substitution are substantial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782235
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of PSA Response to Generic Versus Innovator (Zytiga) Formulations of Abiraterone in Metastatic CRPC: A Retrospective Analysis

Vanita Noronha, Vikram Gota, Diana Grace Varghese, Shruti Pathak et al.
Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Comparison of PSA Response to Generic Versus Innovator (Zytiga) Formulations of Abiraterone in Metastatic CRPC: A Retrospective Analysis

Vanita Noronha, Vikram Gota, Diana Grace Varghese, Shruti Pathak, Kumar Prabhash, Amit Joshi, Sharath Kumar, Apurva Takke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Abiraterone acetate has been shown to enhance overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Presently, multiple generic brands of abiraterone are accessible in India. Nevertheless, evidence supporting the clinical equivalence of these generics when compared to the innovator has not been established, and thus, questions regarding their quality persist. Objectives This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients receiving generic or innovator (Zytiga) abiraterone for mCRPC. Materials and Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, comparative study. All relevant data from selected cases were collected from the hospital's electronic medical record (EMR). Patients with mCRPC, treated with either innovator or generic abiraterone from 2010 to 2019 and followed up until disease progression/death, were included. Patients who switched between generic and reference brands and vice versa were excluded. Patients in both arms were matched for prior treatment with docetaxel (yes/no), age at cancer diagnosis (>60, ≤60 years), and total Gleason's score (≥8, <8), in a ratio of 1:5. The primary outcome was to assess the difference in PSA nadir between the two study groups. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v.21 and GraphPad Prism 8.0.2. Results Out of the 114 patients enrolled, 10 patients received Zytiga (innovator), and the remaining received generic abiraterone. No statistically significant difference was observed in the median PSA nadir between the generic and innovator arms: 20.5 versus 88.5 ng/mL (p = 0.293). Patients in the generic group exhibited a similar median rPFS compared to the innovator group: 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.68–11.31 months) versus 9.0 months (95% CI: 0–18.6 months), respectively (p = 0.539). The median time to PSA nadir was similar (3 months) between the two groups. The proportion of patients showing a PSA response at day 90 did not significantly differ between the two groups, with p = 0.38. The number of adverse events of any grade was comparable between the study groups, although grade 3/4 events were numerically higher in the generic group. Conclusion Generic abiraterone demonstrates a clinical response similar to that of Zytiga. Our findings strongly support the use of generic abiraterone in patients with mCRPC. The potential economic benefits of this substitution are substantial.

Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric OncologyVol. 46(04)
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN), Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.