Accuracy Assessment of Ocean Tide Models in the Eastern China Marginal Seas Using Tide Gauge and GPS Data

Accurate ocean tide models are required to remove tidal loading effects in geophysical research. Beyond a mere intercomparison, the accuracy of eight modern global models (DTU10, EOT20, FES2014b, FES2022b, GOT4.10c, HAMTIDE11a, OSU12, TPXO10-atlas-v2) and one regional model (NAO99Jb) was assessed in the eastern China marginal seas (ECMSs) using geodetic measurements. This involved rigorous comparisons with the tidal constant measurements at 65 tide gauges and with the GPS-measured M2 vertical ocean tide loading (OTL) displacements at 22 sites. The selected models showed significant disagreements close to the coasts of eastern China and the western Korean Peninsula, where the largest discrepancy for the M2 constituent could exceed 30 cm. However, EOT20 and FES2014b provided relatively close results, differing by only about 15 cm in Hangzhou Bay. EOT20 compared more favourably than the others to the tidal constant measurements, with a root sum square (RSS) of 11.1 cm, and to the GPS-measured M2 vertical OTL displacements, with a root mean square (RMS) of 0.49 mm. In addition, to differentiate between ocean tide models with subtle discrepancies when comparing them with the OTL measurements, consideration of the asthenospheric anelasticity effect was necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030395
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy Assessment of Ocean Tide Models in the Eastern China Marginal Seas Using Tide Gauge and GPS Data

Xiufeng He, Junjie Wang
2 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
article

Accuracy Assessment of Ocean Tide Models in the Eastern China Marginal Seas Using Tide Gauge and GPS Data

Xiufeng He, Junjie Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurate ocean tide models are required to remove tidal loading effects in geophysical research. Beyond a mere intercomparison, the accuracy of eight modern global models (DTU10, EOT20, FES2014b, FES2022b, GOT4.10c, HAMTIDE11a, OSU12, TPXO10-atlas-v2) and one regional model (NAO99Jb) was assessed in the eastern China marginal seas (ECMSs) using geodetic measurements. This involved rigorous comparisons with the tidal constant measurements at 65 tide gauges and with the GPS-measured M2 vertical ocean tide loading (OTL) displacements at 22 sites. The selected models showed significant disagreements close to the coasts of eastern China and the western Korean Peninsula, where the largest discrepancy for the M2 constituent could exceed 30 cm. However, EOT20 and FES2014b provided relatively close results, differing by only about 15 cm in Hangzhou Bay. EOT20 compared more favourably than the others to the tidal constant measurements, with a root sum square (RSS) of 11.1 cm, and to the GPS-measured M2 vertical OTL displacements, with a root mean square (RMS) of 0.49 mm. In addition, to differentiate between ocean tide models with subtle discrepancies when comparing them with the OTL measurements, consideration of the asthenospheric anelasticity effect was necessary.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(3)
Hohai University (CN), Minjiang University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, Minjiang University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.