Validation of patient-specific deep learning markerless lung tumor tracking aided by 4DCBCT

<i>Objective</i>. Tracking tumors with multi-leaf collimators and x-ray imaging can be a cost-effective motion management method to reduce internal target volume margins for lung cancer patients, sparing normal tissues while ensuring target coverage. To realize that, accurate tumor localization on x-ray images is essential. We aimed to develop a systematic method for automatically generating tumor segmentation ground truth (GT) on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections and use it to help refine and validate our patient-specific AI-based tumor localization model.<i>Approach</i>. To obtain the tumor segmentation GT on CBCT projections, we propose a 4DCBCT-aided GT generation pipeline consisting of three steps: breathing phase extraction and 10-phase 4DCBCT reconstruction, manual segmentation on phase 50% followed by deformable contour propagation to other phases, and forward projection of the 3D segmentation to the CBCT projection of the corresponding phase. We then used the CBCT projections from one fraction in the angular range of [-10∘, 10<sup>∘</sup>] and [80<sup>∘</sup>, 100<sup>∘</sup>] to refine a Retina U-Net baseline model, which was pretrained on 1140231 digitally reconstructed radiographs generated from a public lung dataset for automatic tumor delineation on projections, and used later-fraction CBCT projections in the same angular range for testing. Six LMU University Hospital patient CBCT projection sets were reserved for validation and 11 for testing. Tracking accuracy was evaluated as the center-of-mass (COM) error and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between the predicted and ground-truth segmentations.<i>Main results</i>. Over the 11 testing patients, each with around 40 CBCT projections tested, the patient refined models had a mean COM error of 2.3 ± 0.9 mm/4.2 ± 1.7 mm and a mean DSC of 0.83 ± 0.06/0.72 ± 0.13 for angles within [-10∘, 10<sup>∘</sup>] / [80<sup>∘</sup>, 100<sup>∘</sup>]. The mean inference time was 68 ms/frame. The patient-specific training segmentation loss was found to be correlated to the segmentation performance at [-10∘, 10<sup>∘</sup>].<i>Significance</i>. Our proposed approach allows patient-specific real-time markerless lung tumor tracking, which could be validated thanks to the novel 4DCBCT-aided GT generation approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adb89c
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of patient-specific deep learning markerless lung tumor tracking aided by 4DCBCT

Adrian Thummerer, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Cristina I. Papadopoulou et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Validation of patient-specific deep learning markerless lung tumor tracking aided by 4DCBCT

Adrian Thummerer, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Cristina I. Papadopoulou, Christopher Kurz, Marco Riboldi, Guillaume Landry, Lili Huang
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. Tracking tumors with multi-leaf collimators and x-ray imaging can be a cost-effective motion management method to reduce internal target volume margins for lung cancer patients, sparing normal tissues while ensuring target coverage. To realize that, accurate tumor localization on x-ray images is essential. We aimed to develop a systematic method for automatically generating tumor segmentation ground truth (GT) on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections and use it to help refine and validate our patient-specific AI-based tumor localization model.<i>Approach</i>. To obtain the tumor segmentation GT on CBCT projections, we propose a 4DCBCT-aided GT generation pipeline consisting of three steps: breathing phase extraction and 10-phase 4DCBCT reconstruction, manual segmentation on phase 50% followed by deformable contour propagation to other phases, and forward projection of the 3D segmentation to the CBCT projection of the corresponding phase. We then used the CBCT projections from one fraction in the angular range of [-10∘, 10<sup>∘</sup>] and [80<sup>∘</sup>, 100<sup>∘</sup>] to refine a Retina U-Net baseline model, which was pretrained on 1140231 digitally reconstructed radiographs generated from a public lung dataset for automatic tumor delineation on projections, and used later-fraction CBCT projections in the same angular range for testing. Six LMU University Hospital patient CBCT projection sets were reserved for validation and 11 for testing. Tracking accuracy was evaluated as the center-of-mass (COM) error and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between the predicted and ground-truth segmentations.<i>Main results</i>. Over the 11 testing patients, each with around 40 CBCT projections tested, the patient refined models had a mean COM error of 2.3 ± 0.9 mm/4.2 ± 1.7 mm and a mean DSC of 0.83 ± 0.06/0.72 ± 0.13 for angles within [-10∘, 10<sup>∘</sup>] / [80<sup>∘</sup>, 100<sup>∘</sup>]. The mean inference time was 68 ms/frame. The patient-specific training segmentation loss was found to be correlated to the segmentation performance at [-10∘, 10<sup>∘</sup>].<i>Significance</i>. Our proposed approach allows patient-specific real-time markerless lung tumor tracking, which could be validated thanks to the novel 4DCBCT-aided GT generation approach.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(6)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.