Conservation translocation immediately reverses decline in imperiled sage-grouse populations

Conservation translocation (hereafter translocation), the intentional movement of organisms from one location to another as a management tool, can be an extremely useful conservation action to increase the abundance of isolated populations following successful habitat restoration. However, managers seek to weigh the benefits against costs to the source population from which individuals are removed. Using two small and imperiled greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ; hereafter sage-grouse) populations, we demonstrated the usefulness of translocation as a conservation management tool and the value of evaluating the potential consequences of translocation action. Using integrated population models and a before-after-control-impact (BACI) design, we quantified the extent to which translocation influenced the finite rate of change ( λ ) of apparent abundance ( N ) in both reinforced and source populations. We also assessed changes in underlying demographic rates in one population, allowing for identification of the specific mechanisms causing differences in population trends following translocation. In both reinforced populations, λ ̂ substantially increased following translocation. In the population for which we had sufficient demographic data, the increase in λ ̂ resulted from a 179 % increase in egg hatchability following reinforcement. In one translocation, we did not observe adverse effects on the source populations. The source population for the second translocation exhibited reduced population growth rates after translocation, although BACI ratios indicated causes for population declines independent of translocation effects, highlighting the need to investigate processes together with observed patterns. Overall, we demonstrated the ability to rescue isolated sage-grouse populations via translocation, preserving population viability and metapopulation persistence. • Translocation increased population growth rates in reinforced populations. • Increases resulted from an improvement in egg hatchability in the Bi-State DPS following reinforcement. • Source populations did not decline due to translocation effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.110986
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conservation translocation immediately reverses decline in imperiled sage-grouse populations

Peter S. Coates, Steve Abele, Megan C. Milligan, Mary B. Meyerpeter et al.
Biological Conservation
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
article

Conservation translocation immediately reverses decline in imperiled sage-grouse populations

Peter S. Coates, Steve Abele, Megan C. Milligan, Mary B. Meyerpeter, Brian G. Prochazka, Katherine A. Miller, Steven R. Mathews, Jesse L. Kolar, David J. Delehanty, Kade D. Lazenby, John C. Tull, David K. Dahlgren
article en

Abstract

Conservation translocation (hereafter translocation), the intentional movement of organisms from one location to another as a management tool, can be an extremely useful conservation action to increase the abundance of isolated populations following successful habitat restoration. However, managers seek to weigh the benefits against costs to the source population from which individuals are removed. Using two small and imperiled greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ; hereafter sage-grouse) populations, we demonstrated the usefulness of translocation as a conservation management tool and the value of evaluating the potential consequences of translocation action. Using integrated population models and a before-after-control-impact (BACI) design, we quantified the extent to which translocation influenced the finite rate of change ( λ ) of apparent abundance ( N ) in both reinforced and source populations. We also assessed changes in underlying demographic rates in one population, allowing for identification of the specific mechanisms causing differences in population trends following translocation. In both reinforced populations, λ ̂ substantially increased following translocation. In the population for which we had sufficient demographic data, the increase in λ ̂ resulted from a 179 % increase in egg hatchability following reinforcement. In one translocation, we did not observe adverse effects on the source populations. The source population for the second translocation exhibited reduced population growth rates after translocation, although BACI ratios indicated causes for population declines independent of translocation effects, highlighting the need to investigate processes together with observed patterns. Overall, we demonstrated the ability to rescue isolated sage-grouse populations via translocation, preserving population viability and metapopulation persistence. • Translocation increased population growth rates in reinforced populations. • Increases resulted from an improvement in egg hatchability in the Bi-State DPS following reinforcement. • Source populations did not decline due to translocation effects.

Biological ConservationVol. 304
Idaho State University (US), Utah State University (US), United States Geological Survey (US), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), North Dakota Game and Fish Department (US), Western Ecological Research Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.