Impact of red blood cell transfusion in massive burn: a multicenter cohort study

Blood transfusions were frequently in massive burn patients, current studies focus on the trigger threshold of red blood cell transfusion, and few studies focus on the impact of red blood cell transfusion volume on patient outcomes. We initiated a multicenter cohort study to explore the impact of red blood cell transfusions volume on patient mortality. 379 patients in three centers were enrolled to the cohort. The extroperative and overall RBC transfusion in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group (p < 0.001), and this difference became insignificant within the operation (p = 0.312). RBC transfusion volume and mortality risk of patients was obviously not linear (p < 0.0001) and would be L-shaped, and the threshold would be 6U. 1:1propensity matching was used to adjust the burn area, full thickness burned area and inhalation injury. There was no significant difference in the outcome and bloodstream infection between the two groups, but the length of stay, length of stay in burn ICU and mechanical ventilation time of the low red blood cell group were significantly lower than those of the high red blood cell group. Our findings therefore support the approach of a restrictive transfusion strategy in severely burned patients. This also confirms the scientificity of restrictive transfusion strategy and suggests that unnecessary red blood cell transfusion should be avoided in clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91052-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Blood transfusion and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of red blood cell transfusion in massive burn: a multicenter cohort study

Yilan Xia, Yong Du, Qinglian Xu, Chunmao Han et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Blood transfusion and management
1.55
article

Impact of red blood cell transfusion in massive burn: a multicenter cohort study

Yilan Xia, Yong Du, Qinglian Xu, Chunmao Han, Yiran Wang, Hongyan Zhang, Deqing Duan, Chuanggang You, Wanting Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Blood transfusions were frequently in massive burn patients, current studies focus on the trigger threshold of red blood cell transfusion, and few studies focus on the impact of red blood cell transfusion volume on patient outcomes. We initiated a multicenter cohort study to explore the impact of red blood cell transfusions volume on patient mortality. 379 patients in three centers were enrolled to the cohort. The extroperative and overall RBC transfusion in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group (p < 0.001), and this difference became insignificant within the operation (p = 0.312). RBC transfusion volume and mortality risk of patients was obviously not linear (p < 0.0001) and would be L-shaped, and the threshold would be 6U. 1:1propensity matching was used to adjust the burn area, full thickness burned area and inhalation injury. There was no significant difference in the outcome and bloodstream infection between the two groups, but the length of stay, length of stay in burn ICU and mechanical ventilation time of the low red blood cell group were significantly lower than those of the high red blood cell group. Our findings therefore support the approach of a restrictive transfusion strategy in severely burned patients. This also confirms the scientificity of restrictive transfusion strategy and suggests that unnecessary red blood cell transfusion should be avoided in clinic.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Nanchang University (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Blood transfusion and management
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.