Routine Clinic Surveillance on Arteriovenous Graft Patency in Hemodialysis Patients with Previous Access Complications

<b>Background:</b> Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are an alternative for hemodialysis (HD) access in patients with inadequate vasculature or advanced age. The effect of routine surveillance for AVG maintenance remains unclear. This study assesses the clinical and economic outcomes of routine surveillance at a collaborative clinic in patients with previous access complications. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited HD patients from the initiation of the clinic in 2020, and divided them into two groups: those receiving routine surveillance and those without. Primary outcomes included AVG interventions (e.g., arteriovenous access [AVA] reconstruction, graft-anastomosis stenting, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]). Other outcomes included AVG secondary patency and costs associated with the interventions. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-two patients with routine surveillance and 65 without were recruited. There was no significant difference in AVA reconstruction rate between the surveillance and non-surveillance groups (0.46 <i>vs.</i> 0.5 per 100 patient-months, <i>p</i> = 0.99), however, rates of graft-anastomosis stenting (0.66 <i>vs.</i> 0.2 per 100 patient-months, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and PTA (30.19 <i>vs.</i> 14.17 per 100 patient-months, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were significantly higher in the surveillance group. No significant difference was observed in secondary patency (hazard ratio: 0.83, <i>p</i> = 0.79). The total costs of AVG interventions were more than double in the surveillance group (110672 New Taiwan Dollar [NTD] <i>vs.</i> 51874 NTD, <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Routine clinic surveillance in HD patients with AVGs and previous access complications resulted in significantly higher rates of graft-anastomosis stenting, PTA, and associated costs, without significant differences in AVA reconstruction rates or secondary patency. These results highlight the need for further assessment of the cost-effectiveness of routine AVG monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.106651
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine Clinic Surveillance on Arteriovenous Graft Patency in Hemodialysis Patients with Previous Access Complications

Cheng‐Chieh Yen, Hung‐Pin Tu, Szu‐Chia Chen, Kuan‐Ying Li et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Medical Sciences
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
article

Routine Clinic Surveillance on Arteriovenous Graft Patency in Hemodialysis Patients with Previous Access Complications

Cheng‐Chieh Yen, Hung‐Pin Tu, Szu‐Chia Chen, Kuan‐Ying Li, Tzu‐Chen Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are an alternative for hemodialysis (HD) access in patients with inadequate vasculature or advanced age. The effect of routine surveillance for AVG maintenance remains unclear. This study assesses the clinical and economic outcomes of routine surveillance at a collaborative clinic in patients with previous access complications. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited HD patients from the initiation of the clinic in 2020, and divided them into two groups: those receiving routine surveillance and those without. Primary outcomes included AVG interventions (e.g., arteriovenous access [AVA] reconstruction, graft-anastomosis stenting, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]). Other outcomes included AVG secondary patency and costs associated with the interventions. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-two patients with routine surveillance and 65 without were recruited. There was no significant difference in AVA reconstruction rate between the surveillance and non-surveillance groups (0.46 <i>vs.</i> 0.5 per 100 patient-months, <i>p</i> = 0.99), however, rates of graft-anastomosis stenting (0.66 <i>vs.</i> 0.2 per 100 patient-months, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and PTA (30.19 <i>vs.</i> 14.17 per 100 patient-months, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were significantly higher in the surveillance group. No significant difference was observed in secondary patency (hazard ratio: 0.83, <i>p</i> = 0.79). The total costs of AVG interventions were more than double in the surveillance group (110672 New Taiwan Dollar [NTD] <i>vs.</i> 51874 NTD, <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Routine clinic surveillance in HD patients with AVGs and previous access complications resulted in significantly higher rates of graft-anastomosis stenting, PTA, and associated costs, without significant differences in AVA reconstruction rates or secondary patency. These results highlight the need for further assessment of the cost-effectiveness of routine AVG monitoring.

International Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 22(5)
Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (TW), Chia-Yi Christian Hospital (TW), Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.