Feasibility study for cryogenic pellets production with pure gaseous helium cooling for ITER Disruption Mitigation System

• Pellet injection test bench for ITER-DMS. • Hot pre-injection process for large pellet formation. • Gaseous helium cooling. • Similar desublimation time, speed, aspect and trajectory with GHe or LHe cooling. CEA/DSBT designed and operated a test bench for pellet injection cooled by liquid helium (LHe) to study the production and the acceleration of large cryogenic pellets for the ITER Disruption Mitigation System (DMS). Large (ø28.5 mm) protium ( 1 H) pellets of ∼3 g were successfully formed in 20 mins and then accelerated above 500 m/s. However, LHe cooling is not distributed by ITER cryoplant and shall be replaced by supercritical helium (SHe) cooling. To evaluate the feasibility of using SHe as a coolant, the CEA/DSBT test bench is modified to operate with pure gaseous helium cooling (GHe at 1.25 bara), which behave more like SHe than LHe used up to now. The main difference between GHe and LHe cooling is the temperature variation induced by the thermal heat removal. In LHe cooling, the heat exchange occurs mainly at a constant temperature due to the liquid to gas phase change (latent heat). In the opposite, in GHe cooling, only the specific heat is available for heat removal, resulting in a cooling temperature increase. Excessive temperature rise is a drawback to the goal of reduced pellet formation times, where the cell temperature must be kept as low as possible. This paper presents a comparison of LHe and GHe cooling using the current ∅28.5 mm in-situ condensation cell and highlights some pellet formation key parameters such as the species (pure protium and pure neon or protium/neon mix) and the cold cell temperature. The protium pellets were the most extensively compared, as they are the fastest to produce and the most characterised with LHe cooling. All other types of DMS pellets were also briefly studied. The GHe cooling results show similar pellet formation durations, pellet aspects and speeds as those with LHe cooling. This proof of principle using gaseous cooling is a significant step in the design study of the ITER-DMS cold cell using SHe cooling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fusion Engineering and Design
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114891
Primary Topic
Fusion materials and technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility study for cryogenic pellets production with pure gaseous helium cooling for ITER Disruption Mitigation System

N. Luchier, P. Bonnay, J. Manzagol, Theo Boujet et al.
Fusion Engineering and Design
Fusion materials and technologies
article

Feasibility study for cryogenic pellets production with pure gaseous helium cooling for ITER Disruption Mitigation System

N. Luchier, P. Bonnay, J. Manzagol, Theo Boujet, Agnès Attard, F. Millet
article en

Abstract

• Pellet injection test bench for ITER-DMS. • Hot pre-injection process for large pellet formation. • Gaseous helium cooling. • Similar desublimation time, speed, aspect and trajectory with GHe or LHe cooling. CEA/DSBT designed and operated a test bench for pellet injection cooled by liquid helium (LHe) to study the production and the acceleration of large cryogenic pellets for the ITER Disruption Mitigation System (DMS). Large (ø28.5 mm) protium ( 1 H) pellets of ∼3 g were successfully formed in 20 mins and then accelerated above 500 m/s. However, LHe cooling is not distributed by ITER cryoplant and shall be replaced by supercritical helium (SHe) cooling. To evaluate the feasibility of using SHe as a coolant, the CEA/DSBT test bench is modified to operate with pure gaseous helium cooling (GHe at 1.25 bara), which behave more like SHe than LHe used up to now. The main difference between GHe and LHe cooling is the temperature variation induced by the thermal heat removal. In LHe cooling, the heat exchange occurs mainly at a constant temperature due to the liquid to gas phase change (latent heat). In the opposite, in GHe cooling, only the specific heat is available for heat removal, resulting in a cooling temperature increase. Excessive temperature rise is a drawback to the goal of reduced pellet formation times, where the cell temperature must be kept as low as possible. This paper presents a comparison of LHe and GHe cooling using the current ∅28.5 mm in-situ condensation cell and highlights some pellet formation key parameters such as the species (pure protium and pure neon or protium/neon mix) and the cold cell temperature. The protium pellets were the most extensively compared, as they are the fastest to produce and the most characterised with LHe cooling. All other types of DMS pellets were also briefly studied. The GHe cooling results show similar pellet formation durations, pellet aspects and speeds as those with LHe cooling. This proof of principle using gaseous cooling is a significant step in the design study of the ITER-DMS cold cell using SHe cooling.

Fusion Engineering and DesignVol. 214
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), CEA Grenoble (FR), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Fusion materials and technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.