An Automated Grading System for Competition Theses Assisted by NLP Models

As the digital transformation of education continues to advance, the inefficiency and subjectivity of traditional manual scoring methods have become increasingly prominent. To address this issue, this study developed an automated scoring process. The process includes several key steps: reading text files, training latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic models, matching texts with conditional sentence libraries, and performing natural language processing (NLP) analysis. The scoring method used in this study follows the standards proposed by advocates of text scoring conditions to comprehensively evaluate the completeness and accuracy of the text. The entire paper is comprehensively evaluated from four dimensions: completeness, content, summary quality, and writing ability.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3711129.3711222
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Automated Grading System for Competition Theses Assisted by NLP Models

Xu Duan, Miaomiao Yang, Shaolin Xue
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

An Automated Grading System for Competition Theses Assisted by NLP Models

Xu Duan, Miaomiao Yang, Shaolin Xue
article en

Abstract

As the digital transformation of education continues to advance, the inefficiency and subjectivity of traditional manual scoring methods have become increasingly prominent. To address this issue, this study developed an automated scoring process. The process includes several key steps: reading text files, training latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic models, matching texts with conditional sentence libraries, and performing natural language processing (NLP) analysis. The scoring method used in this study follows the standards proposed by advocates of text scoring conditions to comprehensively evaluate the completeness and accuracy of the text. The entire paper is comprehensively evaluated from four dimensions: completeness, content, summary quality, and writing ability.

Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.