What to expect from restored Cerrado grasslands? Indicators and reference values from pristine ecosystems

Open ecosystems are disappearing worldwide, requiring urgent restoration efforts. However, limited knowledge of their structure and composition hinders the assessment of restoration success. We aimed to establish reference values for plant community attributes in undisturbed native grasslands to guide restoration. In an unprecedented data collection, we sampled 14 remnants under different climate, soil, and fire regimes, representing a broad portion of the Brazilian savanna (except the least converted northern). We assessed plant community composition, richness at different scales, ground cover by functional groups, and aboveground biomass. From the 794 species recorded, half were unique occurrences, and few were present in over 70% of the sampled areas. Richness ranged from 9 to 22 species/m 2 and 53 to 130 in 30 m 2 . Grasses (22–80%) and non‐grasses (9–45%) did not cover the ground entirely, leaving 4–56% exposed. Biomass ranged from 57 to 715 g/m 2 . Because species composition is variable, finding a “reference set” of species for the whole Cerrado is not possible. Regional subsets and key functional guilds are recommended instead. The number of species/m 2 is a good proxy for diversity, and species/30 m 2 is a good reference for total richness. Biomass is an unreliable indicator due to the broad natural range independent of integrity. The maximum biomass, however, should never be surpassed. Structural targets should include grasses, non‐grasses, and bare soil within the reference range, but achieving pristine plant richness may be unrealistic in most cases. Strong efforts should focus on conservation rather than restoration, once recovering all the reference's attributes is difficult.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70010
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What to expect from restored Cerrado grasslands? Indicators and reference values from pristine ecosystems

Giselda Durigan, Bruna H. Campos, Natashi A. L. Pilon
5 citations
Restoration Ecology
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
article

What to expect from restored Cerrado grasslands? Indicators and reference values from pristine ecosystems

Giselda Durigan, Bruna H. Campos, Natashi A. L. Pilon
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Open ecosystems are disappearing worldwide, requiring urgent restoration efforts. However, limited knowledge of their structure and composition hinders the assessment of restoration success. We aimed to establish reference values for plant community attributes in undisturbed native grasslands to guide restoration. In an unprecedented data collection, we sampled 14 remnants under different climate, soil, and fire regimes, representing a broad portion of the Brazilian savanna (except the least converted northern). We assessed plant community composition, richness at different scales, ground cover by functional groups, and aboveground biomass. From the 794 species recorded, half were unique occurrences, and few were present in over 70% of the sampled areas. Richness ranged from 9 to 22 species/m 2 and 53 to 130 in 30 m 2 . Grasses (22–80%) and non‐grasses (9–45%) did not cover the ground entirely, leaving 4–56% exposed. Biomass ranged from 57 to 715 g/m 2 . Because species composition is variable, finding a “reference set” of species for the whole Cerrado is not possible. Regional subsets and key functional guilds are recommended instead. The number of species/m 2 is a good proxy for diversity, and species/30 m 2 is a good reference for total richness. Biomass is an unreliable indicator due to the broad natural range independent of integrity. The maximum biomass, however, should never be surpassed. Structural targets should include grasses, non‐grasses, and bare soil within the reference range, but achieving pristine plant richness may be unrealistic in most cases. Strong efforts should focus on conservation rather than restoration, once recovering all the reference's attributes is difficult.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(4)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, AES Brasil
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.