Analysis of Possibility of Using an Algorithm for Correcting Metal Artifacts in CT-Images for Radiation Therapy Planning

Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate reconstruction software algorithms in combination with algorithm O-MAR for correcting metal artifacts in CT-images and explore the potential of using O-MAR for radiation therapy planning tasks. Material and methods: A quantitative assessment of the O-MAR algorithm on CT scans of a 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom with a hip joint implant in the center was performed. Test tubes with different concentrations of potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HO4×3H2O) were placed around the implant. The evaluation parameters used standard deviation (SD) of the region of interest (ROI) density in HU units and the calculation of the degree of susceptibility to artifacts (P).The calculation of absorbed dose in the phantom was performed on the Eclipse 17.0 planning station, using the AAA (Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm) calculation algorithm. Results: Calculations of the degree of artifact susceptibility showed that the minimum mean noise value was observed for the iMR series in combination with O-MAR (31.6 ± 45.5 HU) and the maximum for FBP (16) without O-MAR (77.0 ± 31.1 HU). As a result of comparison of CT studies with/without O-MAR, the average calculated difference in absorbed dose for all control points is 0.33±1.68 % and 0.42±1.38 % in the presence of implant for FBP and iMR modes, respectively. However, for both modes the difference was 3.22 % for the artifact zone (dark spot). Conclusion: It is shown that the use of the O-MAR algorithm reduces the distorted values of X-ray density that arose as a result of the presence of an implant in CT studies. The calculation of the absorbed dose for the artifact zone (dark spot) shows a decrease in the uncertainty of the dose calculation in O-MAR-corrected studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Radiology and radiation safety
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2025-70-1-115-121
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Possibility of Using an Algorithm for Correcting Metal Artifacts in CT-Images for Radiation Therapy Planning

Д. С. Семенов, Yuriy A. Vasilev, Olga V. Omelyanskaya, Z. R. Artyukova et al.
Medical Radiology and radiation safety
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Analysis of Possibility of Using an Algorithm for Correcting Metal Artifacts in CT-Images for Radiation Therapy Planning

Д. С. Семенов, Yuriy A. Vasilev, Olga V. Omelyanskaya, Z. R. Artyukova, А. К. Сморчкова, A. V. Petraikin, A. A. Alihanov, А. А. Baulin, R. A. Erizhokov
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate reconstruction software algorithms in combination with algorithm O-MAR for correcting metal artifacts in CT-images and explore the potential of using O-MAR for radiation therapy planning tasks. Material and methods: A quantitative assessment of the O-MAR algorithm on CT scans of a 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom with a hip joint implant in the center was performed. Test tubes with different concentrations of potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HO4×3H2O) were placed around the implant. The evaluation parameters used standard deviation (SD) of the region of interest (ROI) density in HU units and the calculation of the degree of susceptibility to artifacts (P).The calculation of absorbed dose in the phantom was performed on the Eclipse 17.0 planning station, using the AAA (Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm) calculation algorithm. Results: Calculations of the degree of artifact susceptibility showed that the minimum mean noise value was observed for the iMR series in combination with O-MAR (31.6 ± 45.5 HU) and the maximum for FBP (16) without O-MAR (77.0 ± 31.1 HU). As a result of comparison of CT studies with/without O-MAR, the average calculated difference in absorbed dose for all control points is 0.33±1.68 % and 0.42±1.38 % in the presence of implant for FBP and iMR modes, respectively. However, for both modes the difference was 3.22 % for the artifact zone (dark spot). Conclusion: It is shown that the use of the O-MAR algorithm reduces the distorted values of X-ray density that arose as a result of the presence of an implant in CT studies. The calculation of the absorbed dose for the artifact zone (dark spot) shows a decrease in the uncertainty of the dose calculation in O-MAR-corrected studies.

Medical Radiology and radiation safetyVol. 70(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.