Indispensability of International Law for National Security. Advice to a Prince

Abstract This article considers particular aspects of the relationship between national security and the international legal system, against the backdrop of renewed geopolitical tensions. Instead of focusing here on applicable legal norms and relevant international institutions, arguments of indispensability of international law are offered, viewed through the lens of security interests and related communicative processes. Disparate snapshots are provided to foster conversations between international legal advisers and policymakers. Reflecting on ways to communicate a renewed understanding of national security dividends accruing from the international legal order may help bridge perceived contradictions in the analysis of fundamental interests. This may be combined with a realization of the potentially huge transactional and other costs of being seen to attempt weakening or circumventing it. Both benefits and costs are compounded by the increasing complexity, interconnectivity and mutual interdependence brought by globalization with momentous technological and social developments, which may trigger large-scale transformation for the better, but also leads to increased vulnerabilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of International Law
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-94010005
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indispensability of International Law for National Security. Advice to a Prince

Rolf Einar Fife
Nordic Journal of International Law
International Law and Human Rights
article

Indispensability of International Law for National Security. Advice to a Prince

Rolf Einar Fife
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article considers particular aspects of the relationship between national security and the international legal system, against the backdrop of renewed geopolitical tensions. Instead of focusing here on applicable legal norms and relevant international institutions, arguments of indispensability of international law are offered, viewed through the lens of security interests and related communicative processes. Disparate snapshots are provided to foster conversations between international legal advisers and policymakers. Reflecting on ways to communicate a renewed understanding of national security dividends accruing from the international legal order may help bridge perceived contradictions in the analysis of fundamental interests. This may be combined with a realization of the potentially huge transactional and other costs of being seen to attempt weakening or circumventing it. Both benefits and costs are compounded by the increasing complexity, interconnectivity and mutual interdependence brought by globalization with momentous technological and social developments, which may trigger large-scale transformation for the better, but also leads to increased vulnerabilities.

Nordic Journal of International LawVol. 94(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.