What’s to know about politics? Positivism and tradition in Australian undergraduate programme and course descriptions

How do Australian universities today communicate to potential and new students what constitutes fundamental knowledge in the study of politics? To address that question, this article discusses data generated on eight programmes and 108 required or core undergraduate course descriptions in political science; international relations; and, politics, philosophy and economics across five Australian universities. The programme descriptions, it observes, treat students as rational actors who want knowledge about politics for high-status employment. The fundamental knowledge that they need, the course descriptions suggest, is traditional and positivist. Few descriptions made reference to interpretive, feminist or critical methodologies; fewer, to indigenous perspectives. Calls to globalise the political sciences and decolonise the production of academic knowledge currently go unacknowledged in the programme and course descriptions studied. We conclude by suggesting that universities try addressing potential and new students as members of political communities, rather than power-seeking individualists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Political Science
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2025.2454548
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s to know about politics? Positivism and tradition in Australian undergraduate programme and course descriptions

William A. Howe, Nick Cheesman
Australian Journal of Political Science
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

What’s to know about politics? Positivism and tradition in Australian undergraduate programme and course descriptions

William A. Howe, Nick Cheesman
article en

Abstract

How do Australian universities today communicate to potential and new students what constitutes fundamental knowledge in the study of politics? To address that question, this article discusses data generated on eight programmes and 108 required or core undergraduate course descriptions in political science; international relations; and, politics, philosophy and economics across five Australian universities. The programme descriptions, it observes, treat students as rational actors who want knowledge about politics for high-status employment. The fundamental knowledge that they need, the course descriptions suggest, is traditional and positivist. Few descriptions made reference to interpretive, feminist or critical methodologies; fewer, to indigenous perspectives. Calls to globalise the political sciences and decolonise the production of academic knowledge currently go unacknowledged in the programme and course descriptions studied. We conclude by suggesting that universities try addressing potential and new students as members of political communities, rather than power-seeking individualists.

Australian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 59(4)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What’s to know about politics? Positivism and tradition in Australian undergraduate programme and course descriptions — William A. Howe, Nick Cheesman · Australian Journal of Political Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS