Clinical Efficacy of Sialendoscopy‐Assisted Stone Removal for Non‐Palpable Hilar and Intraglandular Submandibular Sialoliths

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to assess the efficacy of sialendoscopy in retrieving non‐palpable submandibular stones located in the hilum or deeper parenchyma compared to traditional non‐endoscopic transoral stone removal techniques. Methods Seventy patients with non‐palpable submandibular hilar or intraparenchymal stones underwent sialendoscopy‐assisted stone removal (SASR). Seventeen patients with hilar stones treated with non‐endoscopic transoral stone removal (TOSR) were the control group. Parameters evaluated included stone characteristics (size, number, location, mobility, and accessibility) as well as outcomes (success rate, operation time, complications, recurrence, and functional recovery). Results The SASR group had four stones in the intraparenchymal glands, two of which were located inferior to the mylohyoid. Complete stone removal was achieved in 69 out of 70 patients (98.57%) in the SASR group. However, one patient had a sialolith measuring less than 2 mm in the intraparenchymal and inferior to mylohyoid that could not be removed. TOSR procedures were exclusively performed to remove hilar stones. Nevertheless, one patient in the TOSR group was unsuccessful in retrieving a 5‐mm hilar stone, resulting in an overall success rate of 94.12%. The operation duration was much longer in the SASR group than in the TOSR group. However, the TOSR group had a significantly higher incidence of acute complications (41.18%), such as swelling, pain, or tongue numbness, compared to the SASR group (7.14%). Conclusion Sialendoscopy is a valuable adjunct to the transoral combined approach for retrieving non‐palpable submandibular stones, especially those in the hilum or deeper parenchyma. A precise preoperative assessment of stone location is crucial for determining the appropriate surgical intervention. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Two academic tertiary medical centers. Level of Evidence 3

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Efficacy of Sialendoscopy‐Assisted Stone Removal for Non‐Palpable Hilar and Intraglandular Submandibular Sialoliths

Han Cheol Lee, Ju Ha Park, Moon Su Kwak, Jae‐Yol Lim et al.
1 citations
The Laryngoscope
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
2.01
article

Clinical Efficacy of Sialendoscopy‐Assisted Stone Removal for Non‐Palpable Hilar and Intraglandular Submandibular Sialoliths

Han Cheol Lee, Ju Ha Park, Moon Su Kwak, Jae‐Yol Lim, Dae Hyun Kim, Young Min Park
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to assess the efficacy of sialendoscopy in retrieving non‐palpable submandibular stones located in the hilum or deeper parenchyma compared to traditional non‐endoscopic transoral stone removal techniques. Methods Seventy patients with non‐palpable submandibular hilar or intraparenchymal stones underwent sialendoscopy‐assisted stone removal (SASR). Seventeen patients with hilar stones treated with non‐endoscopic transoral stone removal (TOSR) were the control group. Parameters evaluated included stone characteristics (size, number, location, mobility, and accessibility) as well as outcomes (success rate, operation time, complications, recurrence, and functional recovery). Results The SASR group had four stones in the intraparenchymal glands, two of which were located inferior to the mylohyoid. Complete stone removal was achieved in 69 out of 70 patients (98.57%) in the SASR group. However, one patient had a sialolith measuring less than 2 mm in the intraparenchymal and inferior to mylohyoid that could not be removed. TOSR procedures were exclusively performed to remove hilar stones. Nevertheless, one patient in the TOSR group was unsuccessful in retrieving a 5‐mm hilar stone, resulting in an overall success rate of 94.12%. The operation duration was much longer in the SASR group than in the TOSR group. However, the TOSR group had a significantly higher incidence of acute complications (41.18%), such as swelling, pain, or tongue numbness, compared to the SASR group (7.14%). Conclusion Sialendoscopy is a valuable adjunct to the transoral combined approach for retrieving non‐palpable submandibular stones, especially those in the hilum or deeper parenchyma. A precise preoperative assessment of stone location is crucial for determining the appropriate surgical intervention. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Two academic tertiary medical centers. Level of Evidence 3

The LaryngoscopeVol. 135(7)
Yonsei University (KR), Gangnam Severance Hospital (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.