Evaluating and Advancing Large Language Models for Water Knowledge Tasks in Engineering and Research

Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant value in numerous fields, there remains limited research on evaluating their performance or enhancing their capabilities within water science and technology. This study initially assessed the performance of eight foundational models (i.e., GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Gemini, GLM-4, ERNIE, QWEN, Llama3-8B, and Llama3-70B) on a wide range of water knowledge tasks in engineering and research by developing an evaluation suite called WaterER (i.e., 1043 tasks). GPT-4 was demonstrated to excel in diverse water knowledge tasks in engineering and research. Llama3-70B was best for Chinese engineering queries, while Chinese-oriented models outperformed GPT-3.5 in English engineering tasks. Gemini demonstrated specialized academic capabilities in wastewater treatment, environmental restoration, drinking water treatment, sanitation, anaerobic digestion, and contaminants. To further advance LLMs, we employed prompt engineering (i.e., five-shot learning) and fine-tuned open-sourced Llama3-8B into a specialized model, namely, WaterGPT. WaterGPT exhibited enhanced reasoning capabilities, outperforming Llama3-8B by over 135.4% on English engineering tasks and 18.8% on research tasks. Additionally, fine-tuning proved to be more reliable and effective than prompt engineering. Collectively, this study established various LLMs’ baseline performance in water sectors while highlighting the robust evaluation frameworks and augmentation techniques to ensure the effective and reliable use of LLMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00038
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating and Advancing Large Language Models for Water Knowledge Tasks in Engineering and Research

Xueqing Shi, Xiongpeng Tang, Rui Tong, Boyan Xu et al.
15 citations
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
35.20
article

Evaluating and Advancing Large Language Models for Water Knowledge Tasks in Engineering and Research

Xueqing Shi, Xiongpeng Tang, Rui Tong, Boyan Xu, Qingxian Su, How Yong Ng, Guanlan Wu, Yu Li, Yuxin Yang, Zihao Li, Yue Yang, Chengzhi Wang, Zihao Wu, Liang Wen
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant value in numerous fields, there remains limited research on evaluating their performance or enhancing their capabilities within water science and technology. This study initially assessed the performance of eight foundational models (i.e., GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Gemini, GLM-4, ERNIE, QWEN, Llama3-8B, and Llama3-70B) on a wide range of water knowledge tasks in engineering and research by developing an evaluation suite called WaterER (i.e., 1043 tasks). GPT-4 was demonstrated to excel in diverse water knowledge tasks in engineering and research. Llama3-70B was best for Chinese engineering queries, while Chinese-oriented models outperformed GPT-3.5 in English engineering tasks. Gemini demonstrated specialized academic capabilities in wastewater treatment, environmental restoration, drinking water treatment, sanitation, anaerobic digestion, and contaminants. To further advance LLMs, we employed prompt engineering (i.e., five-shot learning) and fine-tuned open-sourced Llama3-8B into a specialized model, namely, WaterGPT. WaterGPT exhibited enhanced reasoning capabilities, outperforming Llama3-8B by over 135.4% on English engineering tasks and 18.8% on research tasks. Additionally, fine-tuning proved to be more reliable and effective than prompt engineering. Collectively, this study established various LLMs’ baseline performance in water sectors while highlighting the robust evaluation frameworks and augmentation techniques to ensure the effective and reliable use of LLMs.

Environmental Science & Technology LettersVol. 12(3)
Google (United States) (US), Qingdao University of Science and Technology (CN), National University of Singapore (SG), Beijing Normal University (CN), Institute of Art (PL), TÜV SÜD (Germany) (DE), Institute of Natural Science (KP), Qingdao University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
35.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.