Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: One vs two

Bubble curtains are widely used to protect marine life from exposure to harmful noise during offshore pile driving. However, operating a bubble curtain is costly and compliance with government noise regulations remains a challenge. It is therefore important to optimise the acoustic effect of the available compressed air. An interesting approach to achieving this is to split the air flow rate into two separate bubble curtains, rather than one single bubble curtain. This concept is tested both experimentally and numerically in this paper. The experiments and the model show the expected increase in performance of the supplied compressed air when it is split between two manifolds. An increased insertion loss of up to 11 dB is measured. This increase in performance is possibly due to the fact that the reflective properties of the bubble curtains are maintained even when the air flow rate is halved. In effect, by splitting the air flow between two manifolds, a second acoustic barrier is added. Additionally, the variations in the bubble curtain performance between individual measurements are shown to be largely caused by temporal variations in the air distribution within the curtain. The applicability of equivalent fluid models for bubble curtains is discussed, and it is shown that accounting for a gap in the bubble curtain, close to the manifold where the bubble curtain is not yet fully developed, results in better agreement between the modelled and the measured values of the insertion loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035817
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: One vs two

Dominik J. Krug, L. van Wijngaarden, Simon Beelen, Christ A. F. de Jong et al.
2 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Underwater Acoustics Research
3.59
article

Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: One vs two

Dominik J. Krug, L. van Wijngaarden, Simon Beelen, Christ A. F. de Jong, M.J.J. Nijhof
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Bubble curtains are widely used to protect marine life from exposure to harmful noise during offshore pile driving. However, operating a bubble curtain is costly and compliance with government noise regulations remains a challenge. It is therefore important to optimise the acoustic effect of the available compressed air. An interesting approach to achieving this is to split the air flow rate into two separate bubble curtains, rather than one single bubble curtain. This concept is tested both experimentally and numerically in this paper. The experiments and the model show the expected increase in performance of the supplied compressed air when it is split between two manifolds. An increased insertion loss of up to 11 dB is measured. This increase in performance is possibly due to the fact that the reflective properties of the bubble curtains are maintained even when the air flow rate is halved. In effect, by splitting the air flow between two manifolds, a second acoustic barrier is added. Additionally, the variations in the bubble curtain performance between individual measurements are shown to be largely caused by temporal variations in the air distribution within the curtain. The applicability of equivalent fluid models for bubble curtains is discussed, and it is shown that accounting for a gap in the bubble curtain, close to the manifold where the bubble curtain is not yet fully developed, results in better agreement between the modelled and the measured values of the insertion loss.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(2)
Max Planck University of Twente Center for Complex Fluid Dynamics (NL), HEAD Acoustics (Germany) (DE), Oriental Yuhong (China) (CN), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Underwater Acoustics Research
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: One vs two — Dominik J. Krug, L. van Wijngaarden, et al. · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS