Adequacy of Loop Diuretic Dosing in Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: Insights from the BAN-ADHF Diuretic Resistance Risk Score

Diuretic resistance (DR) is common among patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF) and can be estimated by BAN-ADHF scores. Among 317 consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF, BAN-ADHF scores were compared with metrics of DR and composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, LVAD, or heart transplantation. The BAN-ADHF score was incorporated into a diuretic dosing calculator and retroactively applied to a patient's diuretic dose to categorize them as adequately dosed or under-dosed (inadequate). The primary outcome studied was attaining >3 L of urine output within the first 24 hours of admission. The median BAN-ADHF score was 9 (IQR of 7-13). A higher BAN-ADHF score was associated with greater DR based on weight loss and urine output (all p <0.001). The highest quartile (Q4) had fewer patients achieve the admission urinary output goal (15% vs 32%, p = 0.004) and lower total urine output (2,009 mL vs 2,559 mL, p = 0.029) compared with the first 3 quartiles. In time-to-event analysis, Q4 of BAN-ADHF score was associated with increased risk of the primary composite endpoint (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.04). Compared to those below the calculator's recommended dose, patients receiving loop diuretics at goal doses (37.7% of cohort) had greater 24-hour UOP (3,050 vs 2,050 mL), likelihood of UOP goal (45% vs 19%), and weight loss at discharge (8.95 kg vs 5.94 kg; all p <0.001). In conclusion, BAN-ADHF score correlated with diuretic resistance and prognosis, and may capture the risk of DR compared traditional measures like CKD or NT-proBNP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Cardiology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.018
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adequacy of Loop Diuretic Dosing in Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: Insights from the BAN-ADHF Diuretic Resistance Risk Score

Matthew W. Segar, Pieter Martens, W.H. Wilson Tang, Justin L. Grodin et al.
9 citations
The American Journal of Cardiology
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
12.49
article

Adequacy of Loop Diuretic Dosing in Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: Insights from the BAN-ADHF Diuretic Resistance Risk Score

Matthew W. Segar, Pieter Martens, W.H. Wilson Tang, Justin L. Grodin, Joseph Mauch, Max Puthenpura, Timothy Engelman, Ambarish Pandey
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Diuretic resistance (DR) is common among patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF) and can be estimated by BAN-ADHF scores. Among 317 consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF, BAN-ADHF scores were compared with metrics of DR and composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, LVAD, or heart transplantation. The BAN-ADHF score was incorporated into a diuretic dosing calculator and retroactively applied to a patient's diuretic dose to categorize them as adequately dosed or under-dosed (inadequate). The primary outcome studied was attaining >3 L of urine output within the first 24 hours of admission. The median BAN-ADHF score was 9 (IQR of 7-13). A higher BAN-ADHF score was associated with greater DR based on weight loss and urine output (all p <0.001). The highest quartile (Q4) had fewer patients achieve the admission urinary output goal (15% vs 32%, p = 0.004) and lower total urine output (2,009 mL vs 2,559 mL, p = 0.029) compared with the first 3 quartiles. In time-to-event analysis, Q4 of BAN-ADHF score was associated with increased risk of the primary composite endpoint (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.04). Compared to those below the calculator's recommended dose, patients receiving loop diuretics at goal doses (37.7% of cohort) had greater 24-hour UOP (3,050 vs 2,050 mL), likelihood of UOP goal (45% vs 19%), and weight loss at discharge (8.95 kg vs 5.94 kg; all p <0.001). In conclusion, BAN-ADHF score correlated with diuretic resistance and prognosis, and may capture the risk of DR compared traditional measures like CKD or NT-proBNP.

The American Journal of CardiologyVol. 244
Houston Methodist (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Michigan (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
12.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.