Contact Angle Measurements of the Apparent Line Tension Are Spurious

Phenomena in diverse contexts such as wetting, biological assembly, and manufacturing are attributed to the three-phase line tension. However, decades of line tension estimates based on contact angles of droplets controversially span 6 orders of magnitude, raising the question of which measurements are authoritative. Here, we show with experiments and calculations that contact angles fail to estimate line tension regardless of length scale, technique, and measurement quality. Line tension measurements based on contact angles are driven by two distinct and spurious mechanisms: body forces under ideal conditions, and data scatter under noisy conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Letters
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.134.074001
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contact Angle Measurements of the Apparent Line Tension Are Spurious

Hongjie An, Beng Hau Tan
4 citations
Physical Review Letters
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
5.34
article

Contact Angle Measurements of the Apparent Line Tension Are Spurious

Hongjie An, Beng Hau Tan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Phenomena in diverse contexts such as wetting, biological assembly, and manufacturing are attributed to the three-phase line tension. However, decades of line tension estimates based on contact angles of droplets controversially span 6 orders of magnitude, raising the question of which measurements are authoritative. Here, we show with experiments and calculations that contact angles fail to estimate line tension regardless of length scale, technique, and measurement quality. Line tension measurements based on contact angles are driven by two distinct and spurious mechanisms: body forces under ideal conditions, and data scatter under noisy conditions.

Physical Review LettersVol. 134(7)
Griffith University (AU), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Australian Research Council, Young Scientists Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
5.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contact Angle Measurements of the Apparent Line Tension Are Spurious — Hongjie An, Beng Hau Tan · Physical Review Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS