Changes in quality and aroma compounds of Hu sheep with different backfat thicknesses

• For the same carcass weight, differences in backfat thickness in Hu lambs can result in significant differences in body fat distribution, and differences in IMF content also result in differences in meat quality and volatile odor. • When slaughtered at equivalent weights, Hu sheep with divergent backfat thickness display distinct aroma profile differentiation. • The aroma characteristics of meat with different backfat thickness were mainly influenced by the concentration of the main volatile compounds (E)−2-decenaldehyde, 2-nonyl alcohol and 1- octanol. Backfat thickness demonstrates significant correlations with reproductive efficiency, growth performance, and meat quality parameters in lambs. In this study, we selected six Hu sheep with high backfat thickness and six with low backfat thickness. Post-slaughter meat samples were collected for comprehensive analysis. The result showed that, subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, and tail fat in the HBF group were significantly higher than those in the LBF group ( P < 0.05). Notable variations ( P < 0.05) were also observed in crucial meat quality indicators including higher water-holding capacity (WHC) and intramuscular fat (IMF), lower shear force value, moisture content and luminosity (L*) in HBF group. Among them, the IMF content in HBF group was 26.11 % higher than that in LBF group. Volatile compound profiling identified significant differences ( P < 0.05) in flavor-related metabolites between the two groups. The PUFA content of C20: 2 and C20: 3n6 in the HBF group was significantly higher than that in the LBF group ( P < 0.05), and the fatty acid-volatilome correlation analysis revealed strong associations between C20:2 and C20:3n6 fatty acids with key aroma compounds including (E)-2-decenal, 2-nonanol, and 1-octanol. These results collectively demonstrate that backfat thickness serves as a valuable indicator for predicting both qualitative characteristics and flavor compound profiles in ovine meat products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Food Research
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.100777
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in quality and aroma compounds of Hu sheep with different backfat thicknesses

Qiang Yuan, Enping Zhang, Xiaoyu Huang, Bo Li et al.
1 citations
Applied Food Research
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
article

Changes in quality and aroma compounds of Hu sheep with different backfat thicknesses

Qiang Yuan, Enping Zhang, Xiaoyu Huang, Bo Li, Wenwen Xu, Pengxia Hou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• For the same carcass weight, differences in backfat thickness in Hu lambs can result in significant differences in body fat distribution, and differences in IMF content also result in differences in meat quality and volatile odor. • When slaughtered at equivalent weights, Hu sheep with divergent backfat thickness display distinct aroma profile differentiation. • The aroma characteristics of meat with different backfat thickness were mainly influenced by the concentration of the main volatile compounds (E)−2-decenaldehyde, 2-nonyl alcohol and 1- octanol. Backfat thickness demonstrates significant correlations with reproductive efficiency, growth performance, and meat quality parameters in lambs. In this study, we selected six Hu sheep with high backfat thickness and six with low backfat thickness. Post-slaughter meat samples were collected for comprehensive analysis. The result showed that, subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, and tail fat in the HBF group were significantly higher than those in the LBF group ( P < 0.05). Notable variations ( P < 0.05) were also observed in crucial meat quality indicators including higher water-holding capacity (WHC) and intramuscular fat (IMF), lower shear force value, moisture content and luminosity (L*) in HBF group. Among them, the IMF content in HBF group was 26.11 % higher than that in LBF group. Volatile compound profiling identified significant differences ( P < 0.05) in flavor-related metabolites between the two groups. The PUFA content of C20: 2 and C20: 3n6 in the HBF group was significantly higher than that in the LBF group ( P < 0.05), and the fatty acid-volatilome correlation analysis revealed strong associations between C20:2 and C20:3n6 fatty acids with key aroma compounds including (E)-2-decenal, 2-nonanol, and 1-octanol. These results collectively demonstrate that backfat thickness serves as a valuable indicator for predicting both qualitative characteristics and flavor compound profiles in ovine meat products.

Applied Food ResearchVol. 5(1)
Northwest A&F University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.