Between Truth and Hallucinations: Evaluation of the Performance of Large Language Model-Based AI Plugins in Website Quality Analysis

Although large language models (LLMs) like the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) are growing increasingly popular, much remains to learn about their potential for website quality auditing. The article evaluates the performance of LLM AI plugins (GPT models) in website and web application auditing. The author built and tested two original ChatGPT-4o Plus (OpenAI) plugins: Website Quality Auditor (WQA) and WebGIS Quality Auditor (WgisQA). Their performance was cautiously and carefully analysed and compared to traditional auditing tools. The results demonstrated the limitations of the AI plugins, including their propensity for false outcomes. The general conclusion is that using AI tools without considering their characteristics may lead to the propagation of AI hallucinations in audit reports. The study fills in the research gap with the results on the capabilities and limitations of AI plugins in the context of auditing. It also suggests further directions for improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052292
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Truth and Hallucinations: Evaluation of the Performance of Large Language Model-Based AI Plugins in Website Quality Analysis

Karol Król
4 citations
Applied Sciences
Topic Modeling
9.92
article

Between Truth and Hallucinations: Evaluation of the Performance of Large Language Model-Based AI Plugins in Website Quality Analysis

Karol Król
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Although large language models (LLMs) like the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) are growing increasingly popular, much remains to learn about their potential for website quality auditing. The article evaluates the performance of LLM AI plugins (GPT models) in website and web application auditing. The author built and tested two original ChatGPT-4o Plus (OpenAI) plugins: Website Quality Auditor (WQA) and WebGIS Quality Auditor (WgisQA). Their performance was cautiously and carefully analysed and compared to traditional auditing tools. The results demonstrated the limitations of the AI plugins, including their propensity for false outcomes. The general conclusion is that using AI tools without considering their characteristics may lead to the propagation of AI hallucinations in audit reports. The study fills in the research gap with the results on the capabilities and limitations of AI plugins in the context of auditing. It also suggests further directions for improvement.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(5)
University of Agriculture in Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Topic Modeling
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.