Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

We previously demonstrated that a deep learning (DL) model of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging improved accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to improve the clinical translatability of this artificial intelligence (AI) approach using the results to derive enhanced total perfusion deficit (TPD) and 17-segment summed scores. <b>Methods:</b> We used a cohort of patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging within 180 d of invasive coronary angiography. Obstructive CAD was defined as any stenosis of at least 70% or at least 50% in the left main coronary artery. We used per-vessel DL predictions to modulate polar map pixel scores. These transformed polar maps were then used to derive TPD-DL and summed stress score-DL. We compared diagnostic performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). <b>Results:</b> In the 555 patients held out for testing, the median age was 65 y (interquartile range, 57-73 y), and 381 (69%) were male. Obstructive CAD was present in 329 (59%) patients. The prediction performance for obstructive CAD of stress TPD-DL (AUC, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.804-0.870) was higher than AI prediction alone (AUC, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.758-0.831; <i>P</i> = 0.005) and traditional stress TPD (AUC, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.696-0.778; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Summed stress score-DL had the second highest prediction performance (AUC, 0.822; 95% CI, 0.788-0.857) and higher AUC than traditional quantitative summed stress score (AUC, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.686-0.769; <i>P</i> < 0.001). At a threshold of 5%, the sensitivity and specificity of TPD rose from 72% to 79% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Integrating AI predictions with traditional quantitative approaches leads to a simplified AI approach, presenting clinicians with familiar measures but operating with higher accuracy than traditional quantitative scoring. This approach may facilitate integration of new AI methods into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268079
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Robert J.H. Miller, Albert J. Sinusas, Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Sharmila Dorbala et al.
6 citations
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
8.16
article

Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Robert J.H. Miller, Albert J. Sinusas, Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Sharmila Dorbala, Philipp Antonio Kaufmann, Damini Dey, Paul Kavanagh, Terrence David Ruddy, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Mark A. Lemley, Tali Sharir, Piotr J. Slomka, Edward Joseph Miller, Daniel S. Berman, Sean Hayes, John D. Friedman, Timothy M. Bateman, Joanna X. Liang, Mathews B. Fish
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that a deep learning (DL) model of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging improved accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to improve the clinical translatability of this artificial intelligence (AI) approach using the results to derive enhanced total perfusion deficit (TPD) and 17-segment summed scores. <b>Methods:</b> We used a cohort of patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging within 180 d of invasive coronary angiography. Obstructive CAD was defined as any stenosis of at least 70% or at least 50% in the left main coronary artery. We used per-vessel DL predictions to modulate polar map pixel scores. These transformed polar maps were then used to derive TPD-DL and summed stress score-DL. We compared diagnostic performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). <b>Results:</b> In the 555 patients held out for testing, the median age was 65 y (interquartile range, 57-73 y), and 381 (69%) were male. Obstructive CAD was present in 329 (59%) patients. The prediction performance for obstructive CAD of stress TPD-DL (AUC, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.804-0.870) was higher than AI prediction alone (AUC, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.758-0.831; <i>P</i> = 0.005) and traditional stress TPD (AUC, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.696-0.778; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Summed stress score-DL had the second highest prediction performance (AUC, 0.822; 95% CI, 0.788-0.857) and higher AUC than traditional quantitative summed stress score (AUC, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.686-0.769; <i>P</i> < 0.001). At a threshold of 5%, the sensitivity and specificity of TPD rose from 72% to 79% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Integrating AI predictions with traditional quantitative approaches leads to a simplified AI approach, presenting clinicians with familiar measures but operating with higher accuracy than traditional quantitative scoring. This approach may facilitate integration of new AI methods into clinical practice.

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 66(4)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Assuta Medical Center (IL), Yale University (US), Sacred Heart Medical Center (US), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Heart Imaging Technologies (United States) (US), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
8.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.