An International Study of Factors Affecting Variability of Dosimetry Calculations, Part 4: Impact of Fitting Functions in Estimated Absorbed Doses

Individualized radiopharmaceutical therapies guided by patient-specific absorbed dose (AD) assessments using nuclear medicine imaging have the potential to improve both efficacy and safety. Understanding sources of variability in AD calculations is critical for standardization. The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Dosimetry Task Force launched the <sup>177</sup>Lu Dosimetry Challenge to evaluate variability across steps within the dosimetry workflow. This work aimed to assess the variability in ADs due to different fitting and integration methods. <b>Methods:</b> Anonymized datasets from 2 patients treated with <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE, including serial SPECT/CT scans, segmented organs and lesions, and time-integrated activity maps, were made available online. Participants were invited to perform dosimetry calculations and submit their results using standardized submission spreadsheets. Fitting approaches were categorized, and relative AD variability was analyzed using the quartile coefficient of dispersion and interquartile range. <b>Results:</b> The variability in AD due to the fitting step for patient A's kidneys was less than 1%. In contrast, patient B's kidneys showed higher variability, with values below 10%. Lesions exhibited more variability in fitting than did kidneys, with variability within 25%. <b>Conclusion:</b> The contribution of variability caused by fitting and integration is small for healthy organs. By following recommendations such as selection of appropriate functions, pharmacokinetic modeling, and sanity checks, this variability can be further reduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268612
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An International Study of Factors Affecting Variability of Dosimetry Calculations, Part 4: Impact of Fitting Functions in Estimated Absorbed Doses

Julia Brosch-Lenz, Sara Kurkowska, John J. Sunderland, Yuni K. Dewaraja et al.
8 citations
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
15.06
article

An International Study of Factors Affecting Variability of Dosimetry Calculations, Part 4: Impact of Fitting Functions in Estimated Absorbed Doses

Julia Brosch-Lenz, Sara Kurkowska, John J. Sunderland, Yuni K. Dewaraja, Eric C. Frey, Carlos Uribe
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Individualized radiopharmaceutical therapies guided by patient-specific absorbed dose (AD) assessments using nuclear medicine imaging have the potential to improve both efficacy and safety. Understanding sources of variability in AD calculations is critical for standardization. The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Dosimetry Task Force launched the <sup>177</sup>Lu Dosimetry Challenge to evaluate variability across steps within the dosimetry workflow. This work aimed to assess the variability in ADs due to different fitting and integration methods. <b>Methods:</b> Anonymized datasets from 2 patients treated with <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE, including serial SPECT/CT scans, segmented organs and lesions, and time-integrated activity maps, were made available online. Participants were invited to perform dosimetry calculations and submit their results using standardized submission spreadsheets. Fitting approaches were categorized, and relative AD variability was analyzed using the quartile coefficient of dispersion and interquartile range. <b>Results:</b> The variability in AD due to the fitting step for patient A's kidneys was less than 1%. In contrast, patient B's kidneys showed higher variability, with values below 10%. Lesions exhibited more variability in fitting than did kidneys, with variability within 25%. <b>Conclusion:</b> The contribution of variability caused by fitting and integration is small for healthy organs. By following recommendations such as selection of appropriate functions, pharmacokinetic modeling, and sanity checks, this variability can be further reduced.

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 66(3)
University of Iowa (US), BC Cancer Agency (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Michigan (US), Parents' Place of Maryland (US), Rapid City Regional Hospital (US), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
15.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.