The right patient on the right bed: historical risk profiles of two-year post-discharge recidivists, non-recidivists and long-stay patients at the start of forensic treatment

This study examined whether 12 Historical factors of the risk assessment tool Historical Clinical Future – Revised (HKT-R) and the Clinical factor K12 ‘Violation of terms and agreements’ identified during the Legal observation stage, could enhance our understanding of which patients are suitable to initiate treatment in a forensic high – or medium-security clinic. Group differences in Historical factors were examined among three groups: 40 two year post-discharged recidivists, 337 non-recidivists, and 59 long stay patients. Additionally, Historical HKT-R Spider reference profiles were developed to visually represent these potential differences. Lastly, it was examined whether group membership moderated the relationship between the Historical domain score and the K12 score. Results showed that the three groups differed in scores on 11 out of the 12 Historical factors. Recidivists scored the highest on all Historical factors except ‘Treatment history’ in which long-stay patients scored the highest. Group membership did not influence the association between the Historical domain and K12 score. We recommend that Legal observation researchers consider treatment history and incorporate this information when providing placement advice. The HKT-R Spider can serve as an additional tool to determine whether a patient’s treatment should start in a high – or medium-security clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Crime and Law
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2025.2466089
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The right patient on the right bed: historical risk profiles of two-year post-discharge recidivists, non-recidivists and long-stay patients at the start of forensic treatment

Paul Ter Horst, Stefan Bogaerts, Marija Janković, Marinus Spreen et al.
Psychology Crime and Law
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

The right patient on the right bed: historical risk profiles of two-year post-discharge recidivists, non-recidivists and long-stay patients at the start of forensic treatment

Paul Ter Horst, Stefan Bogaerts, Marija Janković, Marinus Spreen, Guusje Van Iersel
article en

Abstract

This study examined whether 12 Historical factors of the risk assessment tool Historical Clinical Future – Revised (HKT-R) and the Clinical factor K12 ‘Violation of terms and agreements’ identified during the Legal observation stage, could enhance our understanding of which patients are suitable to initiate treatment in a forensic high – or medium-security clinic. Group differences in Historical factors were examined among three groups: 40 two year post-discharged recidivists, 337 non-recidivists, and 59 long stay patients. Additionally, Historical HKT-R Spider reference profiles were developed to visually represent these potential differences. Lastly, it was examined whether group membership moderated the relationship between the Historical domain score and the K12 score. Results showed that the three groups differed in scores on 11 out of the 12 Historical factors. Recidivists scored the highest on all Historical factors except ‘Treatment history’ in which long-stay patients scored the highest. Group membership did not influence the association between the Historical domain and K12 score. We recommend that Legal observation researchers consider treatment history and incorporate this information when providing placement advice. The HKT-R Spider can serve as an additional tool to determine whether a patient’s treatment should start in a high – or medium-security clinic.

Psychology Crime and Law
University of Groningen (NL), Tilburg University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.