The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury

The Strategy Use Measure (SUM) was developed as a systematic tool to assess cognitive, behavioural and emotional strategy use by clients and carers after acquired brain injury. Comprehensive content development was undertaken across four clinical service sites via expert clinician consultation and consensus, file review of strategies used in clinical practice, and consumer consultation. Statistical analysis was undertaken to evaluate items and assess reliability, validity and factor structure. Two final versions of the SUM were developed, for use with clients (SUM-ABI; 14 items) and carers (SUM-C; 24 items). Internal consistency for the total scales was sound (SUM-ABI = <i>.90</i>; SUM-C = <i>.96</i>) as was test-retest reliability (SUM-ABI <i>= .87</i>; SUM-C <i>= .90</i>). Meaningful factors were identified for both scales (SUM-ABI: Memory and Planning, Emotion and Mood, Cognitive Load; SUM-C: Executive Support, Emotion/Behaviour Support, Enhancing Task Performance, Motivation Support) with all subscales demonstrating strong internal consistency (≥.80). Construct validity for both scales was explored using validated measures. The SUM versions were evaluated against COSMIN instrument design standards and found overall to be reliable and valid, with promising utility in rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2462040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury

Lauren Gillett, Wafa Trad, Eng‐Siew Koh, Diane Whiting et al.
1 citations
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
1.35
article

The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury

Lauren Gillett, Wafa Trad, Eng‐Siew Koh, Diane Whiting, Adrian M. Walker, Joe B. Hanna, Grahame Simpson, Teresa Simpson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Strategy Use Measure (SUM) was developed as a systematic tool to assess cognitive, behavioural and emotional strategy use by clients and carers after acquired brain injury. Comprehensive content development was undertaken across four clinical service sites via expert clinician consultation and consensus, file review of strategies used in clinical practice, and consumer consultation. Statistical analysis was undertaken to evaluate items and assess reliability, validity and factor structure. Two final versions of the SUM were developed, for use with clients (SUM-ABI; 14 items) and carers (SUM-C; 24 items). Internal consistency for the total scales was sound (SUM-ABI = <i>.90</i>; SUM-C = <i>.96</i>) as was test-retest reliability (SUM-ABI <i>= .87</i>; SUM-C <i>= .90</i>). Meaningful factors were identified for both scales (SUM-ABI: Memory and Planning, Emotion and Mood, Cognitive Load; SUM-C: Executive Support, Emotion/Behaviour Support, Enhancing Task Performance, Motivation Support) with all subscales demonstrating strong internal consistency (≥.80). Construct validity for both scales was explored using validated measures. The SUM versions were evaluated against COSMIN instrument design standards and found overall to be reliable and valid, with promising utility in rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers.

Neuropsychological RehabilitationVol. 35(9)
The University of Sydney (AU), Liverpool Hospital (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney (AU), Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU), IS practice (BE), Ingham Institute (AU), Royal Rehabilitation Centre (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.