Dynamic modulation of spatial selection: Online and anticipatory adjustments in the flanker task

To track the spatiotemporal dynamics of selective attention, we constructed four theory-driven variants of Eriksen's flanker task. In each, subjects made speeded binary categorizations of target arrowhead direction while ignoring surrounding flanker arrowheads, whose direction was either congruent or incongruent to the target. Experiment 1 tracked the temporal evolution of target selection by systematically manipulating onset asynchrony between the target and flankers. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we increased flanker strength (both experiments) and reduced target strength (Experiment 2B only) at various times relative to target onset, exploring the effects of dynamic perceptual inputs on flanker congruency effects. Experiment 3 measured how uncertainty about stimulus location impeded spatial selection. Our findings demonstrate that spatial selection in the flanker task is dynamically modulated by both intra- and supra-trial factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03026-5
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic modulation of spatial selection: Online and anticipatory adjustments in the flanker task

Mercedes B. Villalonga, Abigail L. Noyce, Robert Sekuler
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Dynamic modulation of spatial selection: Online and anticipatory adjustments in the flanker task

Mercedes B. Villalonga, Abigail L. Noyce, Robert Sekuler
article en

Abstract

To track the spatiotemporal dynamics of selective attention, we constructed four theory-driven variants of Eriksen's flanker task. In each, subjects made speeded binary categorizations of target arrowhead direction while ignoring surrounding flanker arrowheads, whose direction was either congruent or incongruent to the target. Experiment 1 tracked the temporal evolution of target selection by systematically manipulating onset asynchrony between the target and flankers. In Experiments 2A and 2B, we increased flanker strength (both experiments) and reduced target strength (Experiment 2B only) at various times relative to target onset, exploring the effects of dynamic perceptual inputs on flanker congruency effects. Experiment 3 measured how uncertainty about stimulus location impeded spatial selection. Our findings demonstrate that spatial selection in the flanker task is dynamically modulated by both intra- and supra-trial factors.

Attention Perception & PsychophysicsVol. 87(3)
Brandeis University (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.