Global and national actions to prevent trade in substandard and adulterated medicines

Recent mass-poisoning events caused by substandard medicines placed in global markets raise the question as to what more can be done to stop it. Efforts have been underway for years at the World Health Organization and other multilateral fora, such as the National Academies of Medicine in the U.S. While these efforts have led to improvements, several gaps remain which, unless addressed, will allow this problem in international trade to continue. Some countries have failed to implement the standards set by the WHO by not fully empowering national regulatory agencies to lead national efforts. Further, some countries do not fully exercise their responsibility under WHO standards to confirm that the information in documents accompanying internationally traded medicines is complete, accurate, and current. It is time to revisit international standards in this area to determine the causes of these problems and to address them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global and national actions to prevent trade in substandard and adulterated medicines

Richard Wilder, Sam Halabi, Lawrence O. Gostin
2 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
3.76
article

Global and national actions to prevent trade in substandard and adulterated medicines

Richard Wilder, Sam Halabi, Lawrence O. Gostin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recent mass-poisoning events caused by substandard medicines placed in global markets raise the question as to what more can be done to stop it. Efforts have been underway for years at the World Health Organization and other multilateral fora, such as the National Academies of Medicine in the U.S. While these efforts have led to improvements, several gaps remain which, unless addressed, will allow this problem in international trade to continue. Some countries have failed to implement the standards set by the WHO by not fully empowering national regulatory agencies to lead national efforts. Further, some countries do not fully exercise their responsibility under WHO standards to confirm that the information in documents accompanying internationally traded medicines is complete, accurate, and current. It is time to revisit international standards in this area to determine the causes of these problems and to address them.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(2)
University of New Hampshire (US), University of New Hampshire at Manchester (US), Georgetown University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Franklin Pierce University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global and national actions to prevent trade in substandard and adulterated medicines — Richard Wilder, Sam Halabi, et al. · PLOS Global Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS