Evaluating materiality disclosure in sustainability reports: A study of North American construction and engineering firms

This research evaluates the sustainability reporting practices of 10 leading North American con-struction and engineering firms, focusing on adherence to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standards for the Engineering and Construction Services sector. The analysis covers five material topics: Ecological Impacts, Product Quality & Safety, Employee Health & Safety, Prod-uct Design & Lifecycle Management, and Business Ethics. Results reveal significant gaps in report-ing, with most firms failing to meet full disclosure for SASB metrics. Ecological Impacts and Business Ethics are the weakest areas, with limited disclosures on environmental risks and anti-competitive practices. Employee Health & Safety shows moderate compliance, with few firms reporting key metrics like Total Recordable Incident Rates (TRIR). The study highlights the urgent need for en-hanced transparency, standardized reporting, and robust governance frameworks. Improving alignment with SASB standards will foster accountability, strengthen stakeholder trust, and ad-vance sustainability within the sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainability Outreach
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37357/1068/jso/5.1.01
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating materiality disclosure in sustainability reports: A study of North American construction and engineering firms

Andrea Valquiria Sanchez, Jianbin Xu, Harleen Kaur, Juan Pang et al.
Journal of Sustainability Outreach
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Evaluating materiality disclosure in sustainability reports: A study of North American construction and engineering firms

Andrea Valquiria Sanchez, Jianbin Xu, Harleen Kaur, Juan Pang, Jonathan Landsman, Emilia Dunkerley
article en

Abstract

This research evaluates the sustainability reporting practices of 10 leading North American con-struction and engineering firms, focusing on adherence to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standards for the Engineering and Construction Services sector. The analysis covers five material topics: Ecological Impacts, Product Quality & Safety, Employee Health & Safety, Prod-uct Design & Lifecycle Management, and Business Ethics. Results reveal significant gaps in report-ing, with most firms failing to meet full disclosure for SASB metrics. Ecological Impacts and Business Ethics are the weakest areas, with limited disclosures on environmental risks and anti-competitive practices. Employee Health & Safety shows moderate compliance, with few firms reporting key metrics like Total Recordable Incident Rates (TRIR). The study highlights the urgent need for en-hanced transparency, standardized reporting, and robust governance frameworks. Improving alignment with SASB standards will foster accountability, strengthen stakeholder trust, and ad-vance sustainability within the sector.

Journal of Sustainability OutreachVol. 5(1)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.