Evaluating materiality disclosure in sustainability reports: A study of North American construction and engineering firms
This research evaluates the sustainability reporting practices of 10 leading North American con-struction and engineering firms, focusing on adherence to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standards for the Engineering and Construction Services sector. The analysis covers five material topics: Ecological Impacts, Product Quality & Safety, Employee Health & Safety, Prod-uct Design & Lifecycle Management, and Business Ethics. Results reveal significant gaps in report-ing, with most firms failing to meet full disclosure for SASB metrics. Ecological Impacts and Business Ethics are the weakest areas, with limited disclosures on environmental risks and anti-competitive practices. Employee Health & Safety shows moderate compliance, with few firms reporting key metrics like Total Recordable Incident Rates (TRIR). The study highlights the urgent need for en-hanced transparency, standardized reporting, and robust governance frameworks. Improving alignment with SASB standards will foster accountability, strengthen stakeholder trust, and ad-vance sustainability within the sector.
Authors
- Andrea Valquiria Sanchez
- Jianbin Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-9508)
- Harleen Kaur
- Juan Pang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-9890)
- Jonathan Landsman
- Emilia Dunkerley
Institutions
- University of Toronto (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Sustainability Outreach
- Published
- 2025-02-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.37357/1068/jso/5.1.01
- Primary Topic
- Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00