A life cycle thinking-based environmental risk framework for screening sustainable feedstocks in early-stage bioeconomy projects

Understanding the environmental impacts of bio-based feedstock production is essential for sustainable bioeconomy development. Consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluates environmental sustainability, often identifying “hidden” impacts incurred through market displacements. However, it is often impractical to screen multiple bioeconomy feedstocks and value chains using full consequential LCA early in project conceptualisation, owing to high requirements in terms of time, data, and expertise. As a result, critical environmental risks may not be discovered until too late in project development to redirect investment towards more sustainable options. This paper introduces the Bio-based feedstock Environmental Risk Assessment (Bio-ERA) Framework, designed to support early screening of potential upstream environmental risks associated with increased demand for bio-based feedstocks. The Bio-ERA Framework comprises a decision tree that systematically guides stakeholders through consequential life cycle thinking, elucidating sometimes hidden (indirect) pathways of impact among feedstock sourcing decisions. Seven important environmental aspects are addressed: Finite Resource Inputs, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Air Quality, Water Quality, Ecosystem Diversity, Terrestrial Carbon Storage, and Indirect Land Use Change. Criteria are proposed to structure evaluation of (i) probability and (ii) severity of environmental impact, in relation to four categories of feedstock: primary (determining product), high-value by-product, low-value by-product, and waste. Example applications demonstrate how the framework can generate an environmental risk profile for specific feedstocks sourced in specific contexts. Bio-ERA does not avoid the need for detailed LCA evaluation of full bioeconomy value chains, but promotes deeper interrogation and awareness of potential environmental risks associated with feedstock sourcing, in a manner that is accessible to all stakeholders. This could support earlier screening of strategic investment decisions necessary to develop a sustainable bioeconomy. • Early screening of “hidden” environmental risks from increased demand for bio feedstocks. • Bio-ERA decision tree guides stakeholders through consequential life cycle thinking. • Demonstrated via application to cereal, energy crop, grass, aquaculture, and bovine feedstocks. • Promotes early and broad LCA thinking, targeting resources for full consequential LCA. • Provides accessible evidence to guide bioeconomy investment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100201
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A life cycle thinking-based environmental risk framework for screening sustainable feedstocks in early-stage bioeconomy projects

Maeve Henchion, George D. Bishop, David Styles, Jesko Zimmermann et al.
5 citations
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
24.16
article

A life cycle thinking-based environmental risk framework for screening sustainable feedstocks in early-stage bioeconomy projects

Maeve Henchion, George D. Bishop, David Styles, Jesko Zimmermann, James Gaffey, Réamonn Fealy, Wriju Kargupta, Carmen Girón Domínguez
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Understanding the environmental impacts of bio-based feedstock production is essential for sustainable bioeconomy development. Consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluates environmental sustainability, often identifying “hidden” impacts incurred through market displacements. However, it is often impractical to screen multiple bioeconomy feedstocks and value chains using full consequential LCA early in project conceptualisation, owing to high requirements in terms of time, data, and expertise. As a result, critical environmental risks may not be discovered until too late in project development to redirect investment towards more sustainable options. This paper introduces the Bio-based feedstock Environmental Risk Assessment (Bio-ERA) Framework, designed to support early screening of potential upstream environmental risks associated with increased demand for bio-based feedstocks. The Bio-ERA Framework comprises a decision tree that systematically guides stakeholders through consequential life cycle thinking, elucidating sometimes hidden (indirect) pathways of impact among feedstock sourcing decisions. Seven important environmental aspects are addressed: Finite Resource Inputs, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, Air Quality, Water Quality, Ecosystem Diversity, Terrestrial Carbon Storage, and Indirect Land Use Change. Criteria are proposed to structure evaluation of (i) probability and (ii) severity of environmental impact, in relation to four categories of feedstock: primary (determining product), high-value by-product, low-value by-product, and waste. Example applications demonstrate how the framework can generate an environmental risk profile for specific feedstocks sourced in specific contexts. Bio-ERA does not avoid the need for detailed LCA evaluation of full bioeconomy value chains, but promotes deeper interrogation and awareness of potential environmental risks associated with feedstock sourcing, in a manner that is accessible to all stakeholders. This could support earlier screening of strategic investment decisions necessary to develop a sustainable bioeconomy. • Early screening of “hidden” environmental risks from increased demand for bio feedstocks. • Bio-ERA decision tree guides stakeholders through consequential life cycle thinking. • Demonstrated via application to cereal, energy crop, grass, aquaculture, and bovine feedstocks. • Promotes early and broad LCA thinking, targeting resources for full consequential LCA. • Provides accessible evidence to guide bioeconomy investment decisions.

Resources Environment and SustainabilityVol. 20
University College Dublin (IE), Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Shannon Applied Biotechnology Centre (IE)
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
24.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.