Pupil voice as a method in education research: thinking the ‘in-between’

This methodological paper is both an account of the method developed in a study exploring young people’s views of school Physical Education (PE) and a reflection on that process. The research involved 154 pupils aged 14-16-year-old in two English secondary schools. A focus group (6 pupils per school) drove the direction of the study, which incorporated a questionnaire survey of the whole year group in both schools (154 respondents) and 12 individual interviews. Of central concern to the paper is the tendency of pupil voice activities and research to result in compromise or tokenism. The study reported on here attempted to avoid this through a pragmatic approach which was initiated and completed by adults but gave as much power as possible over to young people. Drawing for the first time in this context on Rancière’s theory, it proposes an ‘in-between’ method as a means of doing voice research which acknowledges the multiplicity and complexity of young people’s voices and promotes credibility in place of notions of purity or authenticity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Review of Education
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2025.2458526
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pupil voice as a method in education research: thinking the ‘in-between’

David Littlefair, Michael Jopling
3 citations
Oxford Review of Education
Children's Rights and Participation
12.60
article

Pupil voice as a method in education research: thinking the ‘in-between’

David Littlefair, Michael Jopling
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This methodological paper is both an account of the method developed in a study exploring young people’s views of school Physical Education (PE) and a reflection on that process. The research involved 154 pupils aged 14-16-year-old in two English secondary schools. A focus group (6 pupils per school) drove the direction of the study, which incorporated a questionnaire survey of the whole year group in both schools (154 respondents) and 12 individual interviews. Of central concern to the paper is the tendency of pupil voice activities and research to result in compromise or tokenism. The study reported on here attempted to avoid this through a pragmatic approach which was initiated and completed by adults but gave as much power as possible over to young people. Drawing for the first time in this context on Rancière’s theory, it proposes an ‘in-between’ method as a means of doing voice research which acknowledges the multiplicity and complexity of young people’s voices and promotes credibility in place of notions of purity or authenticity.

Oxford Review of Education
Northumbria University (GB), University of Brighton (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Children's Rights and Participation
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.