Soil Carbon Cannot Efficiently Accumulate in Sand‐Based River Valley

ABSTRACT River valley is traditionally thought a landform with efficient soil carbon accumulation, because it is generally a low‐lying wetter area relative to surrounding landforms. However, soil carbon has been less studied in sand‐based river valley of arid and semi‐arid regions. This study was to mainly understand the capacity of soil carbon accumulation in sand‐based Xilin River valley in arid and semi‐arid Mongolia Plateau by comparing with the surrounding steppe and sandland. We found that soil carbon storage per unit area sequenced in steppe > meadow > sandland, which was inversely associated with soil sand fraction. Soil carbon storage in river valley meadow was close to the mean value in three landforms, without significant difference between both. River valley wetland and water body were also synthesized at weak soil carbon accumulation. These results can be concluded that soil carbon accumulation in the low‐lying Xilin River valley had no predominance relative to the surrounding high‐lying landforms. Sand‐based soils are more aerated than loamy and clayey soils, and their organic carbon is more easily decomposed. Again, sand‐based soils are mainly composed of silicate; their low quantities of organic and inorganic carbons are further mineralized and dissolved by water erosion in the river valley, respectively. Furthermore, low plant productivity, arid and semi‐arid climate, weak sediment transport, and deposition cannot efficiently promote soil carbon accumulation. We suggest that river valley cannot be overestimated in evaluating the storage of soil carbon in arid and semi‐arid regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5522
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Carbon Cannot Efficiently Accumulate in Sand‐Based River Valley

Jifa Cui, Jinchao Feng, Zhiping Wang, Xiaoxian Zhang et al.
1 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
article

Soil Carbon Cannot Efficiently Accumulate in Sand‐Based River Valley

Jifa Cui, Jinchao Feng, Zhiping Wang, Xiaoxian Zhang, Shijie Han, Zhao Song, J.J. Xue
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT River valley is traditionally thought a landform with efficient soil carbon accumulation, because it is generally a low‐lying wetter area relative to surrounding landforms. However, soil carbon has been less studied in sand‐based river valley of arid and semi‐arid regions. This study was to mainly understand the capacity of soil carbon accumulation in sand‐based Xilin River valley in arid and semi‐arid Mongolia Plateau by comparing with the surrounding steppe and sandland. We found that soil carbon storage per unit area sequenced in steppe > meadow > sandland, which was inversely associated with soil sand fraction. Soil carbon storage in river valley meadow was close to the mean value in three landforms, without significant difference between both. River valley wetland and water body were also synthesized at weak soil carbon accumulation. These results can be concluded that soil carbon accumulation in the low‐lying Xilin River valley had no predominance relative to the surrounding high‐lying landforms. Sand‐based soils are more aerated than loamy and clayey soils, and their organic carbon is more easily decomposed. Again, sand‐based soils are mainly composed of silicate; their low quantities of organic and inorganic carbons are further mineralized and dissolved by water erosion in the river valley, respectively. Furthermore, low plant productivity, arid and semi‐arid climate, weak sediment transport, and deposition cannot efficiently promote soil carbon accumulation. We suggest that river valley cannot be overestimated in evaluating the storage of soil carbon in arid and semi‐arid regions.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 36(8)
Anhui University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Qufu Normal University (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Beijing Botanical Garden (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture (CN), Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center (CN), Institute of Botany (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.