Priorities for post-stroke aphasia service development: Prioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design study

ObjectivePost-stroke aphasia (language impairment) has a devastating impact on quality of life and people with aphasia experience long-term unmet needs. A shared understanding of the experiences underpinning these unmet needs is required to identify priorities for improvement. Establishing priorities for meaningful service improvement requires involvement of service users and providers. Therefore, this research aimed to: (1) collaboratively identify priorities for aphasia service improvement according to people with aphasia, significant others, speech pathologists, and (2) co-design a plan for service development and improvement.DesignPrioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design project. Online surveys were used to prioritise ideas (<i>n</i> = 773). Three multi-stakeholder consensus groups were held to shortlist top priorities. Design principles were applied during three consecutive co-design workshops, to develop a concept design targeting the top priority.Participants, settingPeople with aphasia (<i>n</i> = 41), significant others (<i>n</i> = 35) and speech pathologists (<i>n</i> = 75) across 26 health and hospital sites in remote, regional, and metropolitan Queensland, Australia.ResultsConsensus was established on seven priorities: (1) chart alert system for aphasia, (2) training for healthcare providers in ways to support communication, (3) care that is tailored to the individual, (4) consistent care, (5) equitable access to care, (6) intensive communication therapy options, and (7) mental health service options. A concept design (implementation strategy) was created for the top priority.ConclusionsMulti-stakeholder consensus was gained on seven priorities. Development, implementation, and evaluation of the co-designed concept plan for the top priority may decrease miscommunication in hospital settings and enhance experiences of people with aphasia communicating with healthcare providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241310579
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Priorities for post-stroke aphasia service development: Prioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design study

Geoffrey Binge, Kathryn Mainstone, Bruce Aisthorpe, Victoria Jane Palmer et al.
5 citations
Clinical Rehabilitation
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
14.08
article

Priorities for post-stroke aphasia service development: Prioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design study

Geoffrey Binge, Kathryn Mainstone, Bruce Aisthorpe, Victoria Jane Palmer, Sarah J. Wallace, Lisa Anemaat, Julia Druery, David Andrew Copland, Kent Druery
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ObjectivePost-stroke aphasia (language impairment) has a devastating impact on quality of life and people with aphasia experience long-term unmet needs. A shared understanding of the experiences underpinning these unmet needs is required to identify priorities for improvement. Establishing priorities for meaningful service improvement requires involvement of service users and providers. Therefore, this research aimed to: (1) collaboratively identify priorities for aphasia service improvement according to people with aphasia, significant others, speech pathologists, and (2) co-design a plan for service development and improvement.DesignPrioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design project. Online surveys were used to prioritise ideas (<i>n</i> = 773). Three multi-stakeholder consensus groups were held to shortlist top priorities. Design principles were applied during three consecutive co-design workshops, to develop a concept design targeting the top priority.Participants, settingPeople with aphasia (<i>n</i> = 41), significant others (<i>n</i> = 35) and speech pathologists (<i>n</i> = 75) across 26 health and hospital sites in remote, regional, and metropolitan Queensland, Australia.ResultsConsensus was established on seven priorities: (1) chart alert system for aphasia, (2) training for healthcare providers in ways to support communication, (3) care that is tailored to the individual, (4) consistent care, (5) equitable access to care, (6) intensive communication therapy options, and (7) mental health service options. A concept design (implementation strategy) was created for the top priority.ConclusionsMulti-stakeholder consensus was gained on seven priorities. Development, implementation, and evaluation of the co-designed concept plan for the top priority may decrease miscommunication in hospital settings and enhance experiences of people with aphasia communicating with healthcare providers.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 39(3)
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Metro Health Hospital (US), Metro South Health (AU)
Speech Pathology Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
14.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.