GOES‐R PM<sub>2.5</sub> Evaluation and Bias Correction: A Deep Learning Approach

Abstract Estimating surface‐level fine particulate matter from satellite remote sensing can expand the spatial coverage of ground‐based monitors. This approach is particularly effective in assessing rapidly changing air pollution events such as wildland fires that often start far away from centralized ground monitors. We developed Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithm to improve hourly PM 2.5 estimates informed by GOES‐R; meteorology forecasts, and PM 2.5 observations from AirNow. The surface‐satellite‐model collocated data sets for the period of 2020–2021 were used to assess the biases in GOES‐GWR PM 2.5 (only operationally available data set) against AirNow measurements at hourly and daily scales. Then a DNN based bias correction algorithm is used to improve the accuracies of GOES‐GWR PM 2.5 . The DNN uses GOES‐GWR PM 2.5 , GOES‐R aerosol parameters, and HRRR meteorological fields as input and AirNow PM 2.5 is used as target variable. The application of DNN reduced the PM 2.5 biases as compared to GOES‐GWR estimates. RMSE was also reduced to 6.55 μg/m 3 from 8.72 μg/m 3 in GOES‐GWR estimates. The DNN model was also evaluated on two sets of independent data sets for its robustness. In the first independent data set for the first half of 2020, ∼89% of stations show an increase in correlation ( r ) and, ∼76% and ∼62% of stations show a reduction in bias. The IOA and r for the independent data were 0.77 and 0.61 (GWR: 0.68 and 0.53) and RMSE was 4.48 μg/m 3 (GWR = 6.13 μg/m 3 ) for the same period. The algorithm will be operationally deployed by NOAA and US‐EPA to estimate surface level PM 2.5 from satellite derived Aerosol optical depth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Space Science
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ea004012
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GOES‐R PM2.5 Evaluation and Bias Correction: A Deep Learning Approach

Pawan Gupta, Barron H. Henderson, Alqamah Sayeed, Shobha Kondragunta et al.
5 citations
Earth and Space Science
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
5.53
article

GOES‐R PM2.5 Evaluation and Bias Correction: A Deep Learning Approach

Pawan Gupta, Barron H. Henderson, Alqamah Sayeed, Shobha Kondragunta, Yang Liu, Hai Zhang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Estimating surface‐level fine particulate matter from satellite remote sensing can expand the spatial coverage of ground‐based monitors. This approach is particularly effective in assessing rapidly changing air pollution events such as wildland fires that often start far away from centralized ground monitors. We developed Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithm to improve hourly PM 2.5 estimates informed by GOES‐R; meteorology forecasts, and PM 2.5 observations from AirNow. The surface‐satellite‐model collocated data sets for the period of 2020–2021 were used to assess the biases in GOES‐GWR PM 2.5 (only operationally available data set) against AirNow measurements at hourly and daily scales. Then a DNN based bias correction algorithm is used to improve the accuracies of GOES‐GWR PM 2.5 . The DNN uses GOES‐GWR PM 2.5 , GOES‐R aerosol parameters, and HRRR meteorological fields as input and AirNow PM 2.5 is used as target variable. The application of DNN reduced the PM 2.5 biases as compared to GOES‐GWR estimates. RMSE was also reduced to 6.55 μg/m 3 from 8.72 μg/m 3 in GOES‐GWR estimates. The DNN model was also evaluated on two sets of independent data sets for its robustness. In the first independent data set for the first half of 2020, ∼89% of stations show an increase in correlation ( r ) and, ∼76% and ∼62% of stations show a reduction in bias. The IOA and r for the independent data were 0.77 and 0.61 (GWR: 0.68 and 0.53) and RMSE was 4.48 μg/m 3 (GWR = 6.13 μg/m 3 ) for the same period. The algorithm will be operationally deployed by NOAA and US‐EPA to estimate surface level PM 2.5 from satellite derived Aerosol optical depth.

Earth and Space ScienceVol. 12(2)
Marshall Space Flight Center (US), Environmental Protection Agency (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), Emory University (US), NOAA National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (US), University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.