The Doctrine of the Concept and Modern Legal Studies

In modern legal research, outdated logical information is actively used. The paper shows that traditional logic, in general, is not capable of an adequate analysis of concepts and relations, which sharply narrows its possibilities. In the course of the study, it was found that any concept is not a thought about an object, but a property or relation, i.e., an n-local predicate. Therefore, the division of concepts into concrete and abstract ones is meaningless. The idea of the content of a concept is the weakest point of traditional logic, because questions about the composition of the content and the number of features of the content are not even raised. The paper proves that the content of any concept is always an infinite set of formulas (signs). Since the volumes of concepts can contain any number of elements, there is no quantitative relationship between the volume and the content of concepts, which is not a criticism of the law of the inverse relation, but its denial. The analysis of the doctrine of the concept carried out by means of modern logic significantly expands the possibilities of both everyday and scientific practice, in particular modern legal research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lex Russica
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.219.2.112-129
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Doctrine of the Concept and Modern Legal Studies

A. M. Anisov, O. V. Malyukova
Lex Russica
Law in Society and Culture
article

The Doctrine of the Concept and Modern Legal Studies

A. M. Anisov, O. V. Malyukova
article en

Abstract

In modern legal research, outdated logical information is actively used. The paper shows that traditional logic, in general, is not capable of an adequate analysis of concepts and relations, which sharply narrows its possibilities. In the course of the study, it was found that any concept is not a thought about an object, but a property or relation, i.e., an n-local predicate. Therefore, the division of concepts into concrete and abstract ones is meaningless. The idea of the content of a concept is the weakest point of traditional logic, because questions about the composition of the content and the number of features of the content are not even raised. The paper proves that the content of any concept is always an infinite set of formulas (signs). Since the volumes of concepts can contain any number of elements, there is no quantitative relationship between the volume and the content of concepts, which is not a criticism of the law of the inverse relation, but its denial. The analysis of the doctrine of the concept carried out by means of modern logic significantly expands the possibilities of both everyday and scientific practice, in particular modern legal research.

Lex RussicaVol. 78(2)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.